What is the equivalence point on this graph?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the equivalence point in a titration curve for a diprotic acid. Participants suggest using the second equivalence point due to a clearer pH jump observed between 20 and 22 mL of NaOH, where the pH rises from 6.7 to 10.47. Some propose calculating an average of the two pH values to estimate the equivalence point, while others recommend using Gran's method for more precise determination. The consensus leans towards the second equivalence point being the most reliable for calculations. Overall, the second equivalence point is favored for its clarity in the titration curve.
Tianna
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am attempting to do a lab that requires the determination of an unknown diprotic acid using a titration curve. I have graphed my data but I am unsure what point to use as my eq. point. In my lab manual it says I may use the second or first eq. point but the second is often clearer. I am not given a specific equation to determine the point.

In your opinion, which point should i use to continue my calculations? There was a very large jump between 20 and 22ml NaOH leading to the pH jumping from 6.7 to 10.47.

Should I use 10.47 as my eq point?
eqp.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am also thinking that maybe if I add up pH 6.7 and pH 10.47 and divide by 2, I get a value of 8.5 that when graphed seems to line up to what I believe is the equivalence point?
 
Best approach would be to to read the end point from both and to find the average (that is, not a direct average, but the 2nd should be exactly twice the 1st).

Second alone should be a little bit better, as the jump is higher.

Another approach would be to use Gran's method for the end point determination.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top