What Is the Equivalent Resistance Between Points A and B?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the equivalent resistance between two points in a circuit involving resistors R1 and R2, with specific values provided. Participants are attempting to analyze the configuration of resistors, which includes series and parallel arrangements.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up the problem by identifying resistors in series and parallel but expresses confusion over the calculations. Some participants suggest combining resistors in series first before addressing the parallel combination, while others clarify the laws of combining resistors.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the setup of the problem and the correct application of resistor combination rules. There is no explicit consensus, but guidance has been provided regarding the order of operations in combining resistors.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions potential errors in their setup or calculations, indicating a need for further clarification on the application of series and parallel resistor laws.

wr1015
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Find the equivalent resistance between points A and B for the group of resistors shown in Figure 21-29, where R1 = 93 and R2 = 40 .

http://server5.ihostphotos.com/show.php?id=fW6dc414515Bf2aS6b42f0eGf8aad2e7

ok i know that [tex]R_{1}[/tex] and 35[tex]\Omega[/tex] are in series and [tex]R_{2}[/tex] is in parallel to the top 2 resistors but I am obviously making errors either in how i set up the problem or in my calculations. I have tried (1/[tex]R_{2}[/tex]) + (1/2R) = 3/2R (as shown in my book) and then invert to show 2/3(R) and the answer I'm getting is wrong.. please help :confused:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should first combine the two resistors in series, and then combine the result with the other resistor in parallel. What are the laws of combination for resistors in series? What about parallel?
 
Physics Monkey said:
You should first combine the two resistors in series, and then combine the result with the other resistor in parallel. What are the laws of combination for resistors in series? What about parallel?

for series: [tex]R_{eq} = R_{1}+R_{2}+R_{3}...[/tex]
for parallel: [tex]1/R_{eq}= 1/R_{1}+1/R_{2}+1/R_{3}...[/tex]

so you're saying: 93[tex]\Omega[/tex]+35[tex]\Omega[/tex]+(1/40[tex]\Omega[/tex]) OR (1/93 +35) + (1/40) ?
 
Last edited:
nevermind I'm an idiot.. i was forgetting to take the inverse of the answer :redface: :redface: :redface: :redface: :redface: :redface:
 
wr1015 said:
so you're saying: 93[tex]\Omega[/tex]+35[tex]\Omega[/tex]+(1/40[tex]\Omega[/tex]) OR (1/93 +35) + (1/40) ?

Clearly the first statement can't be right since you're adding things that have different units. The second looks ok as long as you mean 1/(93+35). Like I said, first combine the two resistors in series. Take that result and combine it with the other resistor in parallel.
 
Physics Monkey said:
Clearly the first statement can't be right since you're adding things that have different units. The second looks ok as long as you mean 1/(93+35). Like I said, first combine the two resistors in series. Take that result and combine it with the other resistor in parallel.

thanks for the help
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K