What is the experimental basis for Einstein's conclusion on the Helium atom?

AntonHoltz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

As a science writer, I've tasked myself with acquiring a thorough theoretical and historical understanding
of Quantum Mechanics.

It would be interesting to know if there has ever been any experimental verification of Laplace's
spherical harmonics, relating to the quantum mechanical model of the atom; Or if spherical harmonics
are purely a theoretical mathematical solution to 3 dimensional cartesian electron orbital locations
at the various quantum energy levels.

It would also be interesting to know which experimental discovery lead to the abandonment of Bohr's planetary model
of the atom, in old quantum mechanics, the scientists who performed the experiment, as well as the date and location
the experiment occured, and the process through which this discovery lead to the current quantum model.Kind regards,

A. Holtz

.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/Biographies/Schrodinger.html
"On 16 November, in another letter, Schrödinger wrote:-

I have been intensely concerned these days with Louis de Broglie's ingenious theory. It is extraordinarily exciting, but still has some very grave difficulties.

One week later Schrödinger gave a seminar on de Broglie's work and a member of the audience, a student of Sommerfeld's, suggested that there should be a wave equation. Within a few weeks Schrödinger had found his wave equation. "
 
One problem with old quantum theory and the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization is that it could only quantize 'integrable' systems, which are systems in which all motions are periodic. I don't know if that was part of Schrodinger's motivation in searching for his equation. Einstein did know of this limitation of the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization. http://homepages.ulb.ac.be/~gaspard/G.quantum.Encycl.05.pdf
 
.

Thank you for the Quantum Theory PDF link atyy, this is quite interesting.

The only missing information is the experimental basis for Einstein's conclusion
that the Helium atom is a classically non-integrable system.

"In 1917, Albert Einstein pointed out that the Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization rule cannot be applied to classically non-integrable systems (such as helium atom), and it slowly became apparent that radically new ideas were required."Thus far, I've been unable to find any scientific publications confirming the spherical harmonic fields
predicted by Schrödinger wave functions. Perhaps not surprising given the technical challenges..
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top