What is the Force Acting on a Particle with Changing Velocity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the force acting on a 0.2 kg particle with a velocity defined by the equation \(\hat{v} = 7.5(t^2 + 3)\hat{i} - \frac{10}{3}(t^3 - 4)\hat{j}\). Participants emphasize the importance of differentiating the velocity equation to find acceleration, leading to the expression \(ma = 0.2[(15t)\hat{i} - (10t^2)\hat{j}]\). The correct approach involves substituting \(t=2\) into the differentiated equation to determine the net force, which is then used to find the variable force \(F\). The discussion clarifies that integration of force with respect to time does not yield impulse unless force is constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically differentiation and integration
  • Knowledge of vector components in physics
  • Basic principles of kinematics and dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differentiation of vector functions in physics
  • Learn about impulse and momentum concepts in mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in varying conditions
  • Investigate the application of calculus in solving physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as educators and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of forces acting on particles with changing velocities.

Doonami
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 0.2 kg particle moves in the x-y plane under the action of its weight and a force F that varies with time. The velocity of the particle is given by the expression

\hat{v} = 7.5(t2 + 3)\hat{i} - (10/3)(t3 - 4)\hat{j}


Homework Equations


mv1 + \sum\intFdt = mv2


The Attempt at a Solution


Am I crazy? Or Can I just plug in 't=2' into the given equation? I'm sceptical, because it seems too good to be true. It is asking for F at t = 2 and the effect of gravity seems to be accounted for in the vector equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hmmm good question
i haven't seen this type of question before but if your using the equation you have stated it looks like there should be some limits to deal with the integral.
On second thought, if you integrate F dt, you would end up with Ft which happens to be impulse so to be honest it looks a little confusing.
Maybe plug in your value for t into the velocity equation and then your value for t into the equation you have with the integral and rearrange to find F?
good luck!
 
RoryP said:
hmmm good question
if you integrate F dt, you would end up with Ft which happens to be impulse so to be honest
You cannot say that because F depends on the variable t !

So integration of Fdt doesn't give you Ft. this would only be the case if F were independent of t.

Now, the OP's question is to calculate F at t=2 no ?

What's the connection between F and v if you know that F=ma (a : acceleration)

marlon
 
ahhh nuts this is true!
sorry to be no help!
 
a = dv/dt

So, from that I should differentiate the equation for v with respect to time. I can just do this for the individual components (i and j) right? This should yield . . .

ma = 0.2[ (15t)i - (10t2)j ]

multiplied by mass, then sub in t=2.
 
Doonami said:
a = dv/dt

So, from that I should differentiate the equation for v with respect to time. I can just do this for the individual components (i and j) right? This should yield . . .

ma = 0.2[ (15t)i - (10t2)j ]

multiplied by mass, then sub in t=2.
Good. This tells you the net force, now find F.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K