What is the force of the spring constant?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the spring constant using Hooke's law, with a spring initially compressed by 6 cm and launching a 0.2 kg block at a velocity of 2.5 m/s. The calculated spring constant is 32.7 N/m based on the formula k=mg/x. A follow-up question involves determining the displacement of the spring when a 3 kg block is suspended from the ceiling, prompting a reevaluation of the spring constant. Participants clarify that the context of the mass placement—whether horizontal or vertical—affects the calculations. The relationship between the block's velocity and spring displacement is also questioned, indicating a need for further exploration of the physics involved.
tgould43
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If a spring is originally compressed by 6cm, what is the force of the spring constant?
A block of inertia m=0.2kg is launched from a spring onto frictionless surface. The velocity is 2.5m/s upon leaving the spring.
I used Hooke's law and got
k=mg/x
0.2kg x 9.8m/s / 0.06m = 32.7 N/m
The next question is if this spring was used to suspend a 3kg block from ceiling what would the displacement of the spring be?
I need some help with the ratio of what is needed to solve this problem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
would the equation change by the new equation of
3.0kg x 9.8 ms / .06 = 490 N/m
 
My mind keeps thinking that there is some relationship between the displacement of the 2.5 m/s velocity of the first block after it left the spring. Is this something that is valid?
 
I moved your posts to a separate thread.
tgould43 said:
If a spring is originally compressed by 6cm, what is the force of the spring constant?
A block of inertia m=0.2kg is launched from a spring onto frictionless surface. The velocity is 2.5m/s upon leaving the spring.
You'll need to describe the problem more carefully. Is the mass launched horizontally?
I used Hooke's law and got
k=mg/x
0.2kg x 9.8m/s / 0.06m = 32.7 N/m
That would be true if the mass were placed on a vertical spring and allowed to come to equilibrium. Is that what's going on here?
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K