What is the formula for calculating the volume of a rotated graph?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KingNothing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Volume
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the volume of a solid of revolution, specifically focusing on the methods and formulas involved in determining this volume based on a rotated graph.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive a formula for the volume using the average height of the function as a radius for a cylinder, questioning whether this approach is correct. Other participants clarify the concept of volume of revolution and suggest alternative methods, such as using the centroid.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem and questioning the original poster's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Pappus' theorem and the importance of understanding the volume of revolution concept.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion regarding the definitions and methods for calculating volumes, as well as a side note about the original poster's difficulties with LaTeX syntax.

KingNothing
Messages
880
Reaction score
4
Hi. There are a few problems on my homework that involved the volume of a rotated solid. I do not know how to do these, but I'm trying to devise a method. This is what I figure:

[tex]\int_{a}^{b} f(x) dx[/tex] is the area under the graph.

[tex]\frac {\int_{a}^{b} f(x) dx} {b-a}[/tex] is the average height.
This is where logic comes in:
I figure you can use the mean value (average height) as the radius of an "average cylinder" of the function. Therefore, the volume would be [tex]\pi r^{2} (b-a)[/tex], where [tex]r[/tex] is [tex]\frac {\int_{a}^{b} f(x) dx} {b-a}[/tex].

Is this correct? I will simplify once i confirm my Latex is correct.

Alright, with this, is it okay to conclude that the over volume is [tex]V = \frac {\pi (\int_{a}^{b} f(x) dx)^2} {b-a}[/tex]?

On a sidenote, I make mistakes quite often with Latex, is there an offline generator to check my syntax with?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
KingNothing said:
Hi. There are a few problems on my homework that involved the volume of a rotated solid.

Do you mean a volume of revolution? It looks like it.

On a sidenote, I make mistakes quite often with Latex, is there an offline generator to check my syntax with?

Not that I know of, but you do have 24 hours to edit your posts.
 
No. Consider a sphere of radius 1, centered at the origin, so r as you've defined it would be [itex]\pi /4[/itex], since the area under f will just be the area of half of a circle of radius 1, which is [itex]\pi /2[/itex], and then you divide by b-a = 1-(-1) = 2 to get r. So

[tex]\pi r^2(b-a) = \pi ^3/8[/tex]

On the other hand, you know the volume is [itex]4\pi /3[/itex].
 
Mind helping me figure out how you actually do this then?
 
If you used the distance from the axis of rotation to the centroid of the figure instead of the "average radius" then you would have Pappus' theorem.
Here's a reference on volumes of revolution:
http://www.maths.abdn.ac.uk/~igc/tch/ma1002/int/node22.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K