I What Is the Formula for the Position of a Mass Falling Towards a Planet?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the closed formula s(t) for the position of an inertial mass in free fall towards a planet, starting from an initial distance. The gravitational force is expressed using F=G(Mm)/r^2, leading to the acceleration a(t) = GM/(r(t)^2). The equation s'' = k/(s^2) is proposed for solving the motion, but confusion arises regarding the correct integration method. A suggestion is made to integrate with respect to s rather than t, noting that the integration may involve inverse trigonometric functions. The conversation concludes with encouragement to explore numerical methods for inverting the expression to find s(t).
Zeeprime
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Question: Finding the closed formula s(t) that gives the approaching position of an inertial mass to a planet
Supposing the mass initially stationary, and far enough and for long enough that it is NOT possible to consider the gravity as constant while it moves closer and closer.

Said in a different way.
Given a mass in free fall from afar to a planet, what is the motion formula s(t),
the one that returns:
at 0 seconds the mass will be 100000km distant
at 10 seconds the mass will be 99999Km distant.
at 20 seconds the mass will be 99996Km distant
at 100 seconds the mass will be 94000Km distant (it is accelerating, and the acceleration increases while it approaches the planet), etc.

So given M= the mass of the planet
m = the mass of the free fall mass
So = the initial distance of the mass

Given F=G(Mm)/r^2
we obtain
m*a(t) = GMm/(r(t)^2)
a(t) = GM/(r(t)^2)

Now we solve with derivative calculus
Posing k=GM
s'' = k/(s^2)

Is the above correct?
If it is, how can I solve this differential equation?
(I suppose a constant will pop out from some integral, and it will be our initial S0)

Can I simply integrate left and right a couple of times?
Providing all is preserved, no bad negatives, no 0s around, all functions are analytical in complex space as they appear to be etc.

If I can, I suppose that I will end up with
s' = S0-k/s
s = S0-k/(ln(s))

which is:
s(t) = S0-k/(ln(s(t))

And now? How can I get s(t) ?

Another way to solve this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's go back to your equation
s'' = k/(s^2)

You tried to integrate this directly, giving s' on the left hand side. In other words you were integrating with respect to t. So you'd also have to integrate the right hand side with respect to t, not s as you tried to do. The real next step is to note that s'' = v(dv/ds), where v=s'. Then you can integrate both sides w.r.t. s. There's maybe a page of algebra to get to the final result, depending on how fluent you are, but it's not as intimidating as the general formulae on Wikipedia make it look.

Yes you get t as a function of s; you'll probably find it involves inverse trig functions. That's the way the world works. You can get the answers you want by simple interpolation, or by inverting the expression numerically, for instance using a Newton-Raphson algorithm.

(Note that you're considering a special case, where the mass is falling directly towards the centre of the planet, and has negligible mass compared to the planet.)
 
Thanks.
I will try developing from your advice
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top