What is the formula for these pattern data sequences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ryan8200
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Data Formula
ryan8200
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
How to derive formula for the series of numbers as below:
(a) 4,8,15,16,23,42
(b) 4,17, 23,38,41,46
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The sequences are so jerky that you really need longer samples for the question even to be meaningful. Yes, you could make up formulae to generate these, but they would likely contain five or more arbitrary constants, so you'd have no confidence they mean anything.
 
Hi Ryan. Do the numbers represent anything in particular? Do you have a reason to use such a formula, like interpolation or extrapolation?

There are many ways to fit those points to a curve, but whether or not any particular formula has any significant meaning is another question.

For the first one for example, you can write:

T_k = - \frac{9}{40} k^5 + \frac{25}{8} k^4 - \frac{117}{8} k^3 + \frac{215}{8} k^2 - \frac{223}{20} k + 4 \, \, \, \, \, : \,k = 0,1,2,3 \ldots
 
Another series for the first one is,

T_k = \frac{1}{217} \left( 454 \, T_{k-3} - 63 \, T_{k-2} + 144 \, T_{k-1} \right)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top