What Is the Fundamental Frequency of a Modified Stretched Wire?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the fundamental frequency of a modified stretched wire, initially vibrating at 369Hz. The wire's length is reduced to one third, its diameter is tripled, and its tension is doubled. Participants clarify the impact of these changes on the frequency formula, emphasizing the correct interpretation of the factors involved, particularly the relationship between diameter and radius. The original poster struggles with the calculations, specifically how to adjust the frequency based on the modified parameters. Ultimately, the conversation helps refine the understanding of the formula and corrects the approach to finding the new frequency.
dantechiesa

Homework Statement


A stretched wire vibrates in its first normal mode at a frequency of 369Hz. What would be the fundamental frequency if the wire were one third as long, its diameter were tripled, and its tension were increased two-fold?

Homework Equations



f = 1/2L * squareroot(Ft/u)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Can someone explain what I've done wrong?

369 = 1/2L * Sroot(Ft/u)

L is 1/3, so 1/2L becomes 3/(2L)

The Ft is doubled, but the u needs to be broken down further.
m/l = u
l is 1/3
m = dv
d stays the same, so v is the relevant one.
V = pi r2h
r is tripled, so the V increases by a factor of 9. However, since the h (aka l) also changes by a third. Total change of V is x3.

so, 3*m / (l/3)
All together,
Sroot ( 2Ft / (9u)

However, 369 * (3/2) * Sqroot (2/9) is wrong. ( = 260.922402258)

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You had a factor of 1/2L. Now you have a factor of 3/2L. So you don't multiply by 3/2.
 
  • Like
Likes dantechiesa
Diameter is tripled

In the formula for V , r is the radius , so since diameter is tripled, radius goes up by x1.5.
 
Radius and diameter are in proportion. If one is tripled, so is the other.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
mjc123 said:
You had a factor of 1/2L. Now you have a factor of 3/2L. So you don't multiply by 3/2.
Oh would you multiply by 3 only? Since the 1/2 was already apart of the equation?

ALso, does the remaining work with the square root seem right?

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Yes
 
  • Like
Likes dantechiesa
mjc123 said:
Yes
Thanks a lot!
 
Back
Top