What is the general definition of emf?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kelvin490
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Emf General
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the definition of electromotive force (emf) in electrical circuits, highlighting three distinct types. The first type is the emf generated by a battery, representing the voltage difference supplied to the circuit. The second type arises from a moving conductor within a magnetic field, defined as the work done to elevate a charge to a higher potential. The third type involves the work done to move a charge around a stationary loop in a changing magnetic field, expressed mathematically as the line integral of "E dot l" around a closed loop. The conversation emphasizes the complexity and variability of emf definitions across different scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic electrical concepts, including voltage and current.
  • Familiarity with magnetic fields and their interaction with conductors.
  • Knowledge of line integrals and their application in physics.
  • Basic grasp of circuit theory and electromagnetism principles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical formulation of emf, including the line integral of "E dot l".
  • Study the principles of electromagnetic induction as described by Faraday's Law.
  • Explore the differences between electrostatic and magnetic forces in circuits.
  • Examine the various applications of emf in real-world electrical systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of electromotive force and its applications in circuit design and analysis.

kelvin490
Gold Member
Messages
227
Reaction score
3
I have little problem in understanding emf in a circuit. There are three types of emf mentioned in textbooks and the first two are very similar:

1. The emf provided by a battery or other stationary power source. The emf is actually the voltage difference provided to the circuit.

2. The emf provided by a moving conductor in magnetic field.It is the work done to raise a charge to higher potential.

3. The work done to move a charge around a stationary loop encircled a changing magnetic field.

In the third case, the emf is defined as line integral of "E dot l" around a closed loop. However, in the second case, it doesn't make any sense to do the same integral around the circuit because in the moving conductor the force is magnetic but in the rest of the circuit the force is electrostatic in nature (because the charge accumulated on the two sides of moving conductor). So the line integral is only for the the part that is moving. It seems that there is a lack of general definition of emf because it different cases it means slightly different things. How to resolve this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
972
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
9K