What is the Haar Measure on SO(4) and Where Can I Find References?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bobhawke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
Bobhawke
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
I wasn't quite sure where to post this question, so please forgive me if I chose the wrong place.

Essentially I'm looking for an explicit expression for the Haar measure on SO(4), i.e. in terms of angles, or if you prefer, expressed in terms of the Lebesgue integral over a subset of the Lie algebra.

Does anyone know any references which might contain this?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bobhawke said:
I wasn't quite sure where to post this question, so please forgive me if I chose the wrong place.

Essentially I'm looking for an explicit expression for the Haar measure on SO(4), i.e. in terms of angles, or if you prefer, expressed in terms of the Lebesgue integral over a subset of the Lie algebra.

Does anyone know any references which might contain this?

Thank you.

There's one in the appendix of http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.0267. There is at least one typo there, but the overall construction is using the correct methods.
 
Thank you!
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top