What is the Harmonic Vibrational Frequency of a 39^K 35^Cl Molecule?

Ajs51
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. A molecule of 39^K 35^Cl consists of two ions,39^K+ and 35^Cl−,which are attracted to each other by electrostatic forces. The short-range repulsive force results in an interatomic distance of 2.7 ˚A at equilibrium. Considering only the electrostatic attraction, derive an expression for the force constant using Hooke’s law.Hence, determine the harmonic vibrational frequency of the 39^K 35^Cl molecule in wavenumbers.



3. I just can't seem to do this any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is one positive charge on the potassium and one negative charge on the chlorine. The attractive force is from these two opposite charges. It sounds to me like you are supposed to treat the repulsive force as being spring-like. You also know the distance between the atoms when the forces cancel each other out exactly, so that should give you all of the information that you need. Hopefully that points you in the right direction.
 
Oh that makes sense..would it make sense to set the Coulomb force, equal to the hooke law...solve to find k...then use k to find w (angular frequency) ?
 
Also thanks for the help!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top