B What is the highest redshift (Z number) a galaxy can have?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy Redshift
AI Thread Summary
Galaxies are being discovered at increasingly higher redshifts, with the current limit believed to be between z=22 and z=23, marking the end of the dark ages of the universe. Atoms formed before z=1089, while the first stars and galaxies likely emerged shortly after z=20, initiating the reionization process. The formation of these early stars is crucial as they emitted high-energy photons that ionized the surrounding gas. There is speculation that supermassive black holes could have formed even before the first stars appeared. Ongoing research, including observations from the James Webb Space Telescope, aims to explore these early cosmic structures further.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
Galaxies seem to being found further and further back to the BB, At what epoch is it going to be impossible for galaxies to form?
https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.4263
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Thank you for the reply, as I can make out atoms formed about
Z=20 at the latest, so I expect galaxies to form some time after that.?
 
wolram said:
Thank you for the reply, as I can make out atoms formed about
Z=20 at the latest, so I expect galaxies to form some time after that.?
Atoms formed sometime before z=1089 (the redshift of the CMB). Perhaps you meant stars?

The formation of the first stars and galaxies would have been the event which kicked off the process of reionization:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reionization

The basic process is that as the first stars formed, they put out a lot of photons that were high enough in energy to ionize the gas that was spread throughout the universe. These stars would have formed in the most dense regions first, forming the first galaxies.
 
The current tlimit on redshift is believed to be beteen z=22 and z=23. which corresponds to the so-called dark ages which lasted until the universe was about 150,000,000 years old Star formation should theoretically not have begun any earlier than that. It is, however, considered theoretically possible the seeds of what would become supermassive black holes black holes could have fromed before the first stars lit up. Thes JWST could possibly detects these as discussed here; https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.6075, The Formation of the First Massive Black Holes.
 
Thank you for replies.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top