What Is the Intersection of Subsets in Real Analysis?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the intersection of subsets in real analysis, specifically focusing on the sets E and F defined by certain intervals. Participants are exploring the implications of these intersections and the function f applied to these sets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to demonstrate that the intersection of sets E and F is only at the point 0. Questions arise regarding the function f and its application to the sets and their intersections. There is also discussion about the implications of removing 0 from the sets.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the definitions and properties of the sets and their intersections. Some participants have provided guidance on understanding the implications of the intersection and the function f, while others are questioning the accuracy of previous statements and clarifying definitions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential typos in the definitions of the sets E and F, which may affect the understanding of the problem. There is also mention of the distinction between the empty set and non-empty sets in the context of the discussion.

phillyolly
Messages
157
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is attached. Please help me out in understanding this problem. This is not a HW question, just for my own understanding...

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • pic.jpg
    pic.jpg
    16.3 KB · Views: 415
Physics news on Phys.org
So, first, I would like to show that E intersects with F in 0.
Since E= -1>=x>=0 and F E= 0>=x>=1, these two intervals overlap only in 0.
 
What is f(E) in this question?
 
do you have a question about the problem? Even if its not for homeowrk, you should attempt it & get lead through
 
Here was I tried to solve. I found that f(E) and f(F) are the same. I don't get that f(E overlap F)=0.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0141.jpg
    IMG_0141.jpg
    35.8 KB · Views: 394
Well you showed that [tex]E \cap F = \{ 0 \}.[/tex] So then we simply have

[tex]f(E \cap F) = f(\{ 0 \}) = f(0) = 0.[/tex]

I don't get where you're getting lost. Anything in specific?
You also already showed that f(E) = f(F) = {y : 0 <= y <= 1}, so that parts good.

All that's left is for you to answer the following: "What would happen if 0 is deleted from the sets E and F?"
What would E intersect F be? What would f(E intersect F) be? Would f(E) still equal f(F)? And probably most importantly: would we still have [tex]f(E \cap F) \subset ( f(E) \cap f(F) )[/tex] ?
 
Answering your questions,
(E intersect F)=N/A,
f(E intersect F)=N/A,
f(E) will still be equal f(F),
And the last question is tricky for me.
 
you already know [tex] f(E \cap F)=\left\{\right\},\emptyset, empty set[/tex] and [tex]( f(E) \cap f(F) ) =\left\{y\inR:0<y\leq1\right\}[/tex]

so the question are [tex] \emptyset \subset \left\{y\inR:0<y\leq1\right\}[/tex]??
 
Last edited:
No, there is no empty set in 0=<y=<1...
Thank you...
 
Last edited:
  • #10
i don't know this is definition or theorem, because i didn't take rigorous set theory yet.

Definition.
Empty set is the set having no element, and it is a subset of every set

the answer to [tex] <br /> \emptyset \subset \left\{y\inR:0<y\leq1\right\}<br /> [/tex] is true.

even [tex] <br /> \emptyset \subset \emptyset<br /> [/tex] is also true for your information because empty set itself is a set
 
  • #11
This is very helpful for a dummie like me, thank you a lot.
 
  • #12
phillyolly said:
So, first, I would like to show that E intersects with F in 0.
Since E= -1>=x>=0 and F E= 0>=x>=1, these two intervals overlap only in 0.

No, E = {x | -1 <= x <= 0} and F = {x | 0 <= x <= 1}

As you wrote E, it must be true that -1 >= 0, which is not true. For F, you have 0 >= 1, which is also not true.
 
  • #13
Mark44, that was a typo on his part. Look at his work in the latest attached thumbnail and his posts since then. He's got it pretty much now I think.
 
  • #14
phillyolly said:
Answering your questions,
(E intersect F)=N/A,
f(E intersect F)=N/A,
f(E) will still be equal f(F),
And the last question is tricky for me.

Your first two answers are incorrect. E [itex]\cup[/itex] F = {0}. This is not the empty set. As Raskolnikov already mentioned, f(E [itex]\cup[/itex] F) = f(0) = 0, which is also not the empty set.

When the problem asks about f(E), it is asking about the interval along the y-axis that the set E is mapped to. IOW, f(E) = {y | y = f(x) for some x in E}.
 
  • #15
Raskolnikov said:
Mark44, that was a typo on his part. Look at his work in the latest attached thumbnail and his posts since then. He's got it pretty much now I think.
The work in the attached file in post 5 looks pretty good, but post 7, which came later, has some errors, so I'm not so sure the OP has it quite yet.
 
  • #16
hmm, mark44, i think
that answer was referred to "What would happen if 0 is deleted from the sets E and F?" and its
[tex]E\cap F[/tex]
;P
 
  • #17
I came late to the party, so I missed it that we were removing 0 from the intersection. Sorry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K