What Is the Intersection of Subsets in Real Analysis?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
16 replies · 3K views
phillyolly
Messages
157
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is attached. Please help me out in understanding this problem. This is not a HW question, just for my own understanding...

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • pic.jpg
    pic.jpg
    16.3 KB · Views: 425
Physics news on Phys.org
So, first, I would like to show that E intersects with F in 0.
Since E= -1>=x>=0 and F E= 0>=x>=1, these two intervals overlap only in 0.
 
What is f(E) in this question?
 
Here was I tried to solve. I found that f(E) and f(F) are the same. I don't get that f(E overlap F)=0.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0141.jpg
    IMG_0141.jpg
    35.8 KB · Views: 403
Well you showed that [tex]E \cap F = \{ 0 \}.[/tex] So then we simply have

[tex]f(E \cap F) = f(\{ 0 \}) = f(0) = 0.[/tex]

I don't get where you're getting lost. Anything in specific?
You also already showed that f(E) = f(F) = {y : 0 <= y <= 1}, so that parts good.

All that's left is for you to answer the following: "What would happen if 0 is deleted from the sets E and F?"
What would E intersect F be? What would f(E intersect F) be? Would f(E) still equal f(F)? And probably most importantly: would we still have [tex]f(E \cap F) \subset ( f(E) \cap f(F) )[/tex] ?
 
Answering your questions,
(E intersect F)=N/A,
f(E intersect F)=N/A,
f(E) will still be equal f(F),
And the last question is tricky for me.
 
you already know [tex] f(E \cap F)=\left\{\right\},\emptyset, empty set[/tex] and [tex]( f(E) \cap f(F) ) =\left\{y\inR:0<y\leq1\right\}[/tex]

so the question are [tex] \emptyset \subset \left\{y\inR:0<y\leq1\right\}[/tex]??
 
Last edited:
No, there is no empty set in 0=<y=<1...
Thank you...
 
Last edited:
i don't know this is definition or theorem, because i didn't take rigorous set theory yet.

Definition.
Empty set is the set having no element, and it is a subset of every set

the answer to [tex] <br /> \emptyset \subset \left\{y\inR:0<y\leq1\right\}<br /> [/tex] is true.

even [tex] <br /> \emptyset \subset \emptyset<br /> [/tex] is also true for your information because empty set itself is a set
 
This is very helpful for a dummie like me, thank you a lot.
 
phillyolly said:
So, first, I would like to show that E intersects with F in 0.
Since E= -1>=x>=0 and F E= 0>=x>=1, these two intervals overlap only in 0.

No, E = {x | -1 <= x <= 0} and F = {x | 0 <= x <= 1}

As you wrote E, it must be true that -1 >= 0, which is not true. For F, you have 0 >= 1, which is also not true.
 
Mark44, that was a typo on his part. Look at his work in the latest attached thumbnail and his posts since then. He's got it pretty much now I think.
 
phillyolly said:
Answering your questions,
(E intersect F)=N/A,
f(E intersect F)=N/A,
f(E) will still be equal f(F),
And the last question is tricky for me.

Your first two answers are incorrect. E [itex]\cup[/itex] F = {0}. This is not the empty set. As Raskolnikov already mentioned, f(E [itex]\cup[/itex] F) = f(0) = 0, which is also not the empty set.

When the problem asks about f(E), it is asking about the interval along the y-axis that the set E is mapped to. IOW, f(E) = {y | y = f(x) for some x in E}.
 
Raskolnikov said:
Mark44, that was a typo on his part. Look at his work in the latest attached thumbnail and his posts since then. He's got it pretty much now I think.
The work in the attached file in post 5 looks pretty good, but post 7, which came later, has some errors, so I'm not so sure the OP has it quite yet.
 
hmm, mark44, i think
that answer was referred to "What would happen if 0 is deleted from the sets E and F?" and its
[tex]E\cap F[/tex]
;P