What is the intuitive meaning of a simply connected region?

  • Thread starter Thread starter de_brook
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A simply connected region in the complex plane allows any simple closed curve within it to be continuously deformed to a point without crossing the region's boundary. The discussion emphasizes that the intuitive understanding of simply connected regions inherently involves the absence of holes, as any hole would prevent such deformation. An analogy using a string illustrates that if a closed curve surrounds an obstacle, it cannot be shrunk to a point without crossing the boundary. The process of deformation is described as a homotopy, which parametrizes the transformation of shapes, such as an ellipse to a circle or a point. Overall, the concept of simply connected regions is fundamentally tied to the ability to shrink curves without obstruction.
de_brook
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
A region in the complex plane is said to be simply connected if any simple closed curve in the region can be shrunk or continuously deformed to a point in the region.

My question is: How can i understand the intuitive meaning of this definition without using the fact that the simply connected region has no hole in it? Please what does it mean that the simple closed curve is continuously deformed to a point?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
de_brook said:
A region in the complex plane is said to be simply connected if any simple closed curve in the region can be shrunk or continuously deformed to a point in the region.

My question is: How can i understand the intuitive meaning of this definition without using the fact that the simply connected region has no hole in it? Please what does it mean that the simple closed curve is continuously deformed to a point?
I'm not sure what you mean by "without using the fact that the simply connected region has no hole in it". That is the "intuitive meaning"! If there is a "hole" in a region in the plane, then the boundary of that hole cannot be shrunk to a point.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I'm not sure what you mean by "without using the fact that the simply connected region has no hole in it". That is the "intuitive meaning"! If there is a "hole" in a region in the plane, then the boundary of that hole cannot be shrunk to a point.

Are you saying the hole is a is a closed curve in the region? ofcourse yes. If so how can a closed curve be continuously deformed or shrunk to a point in the region
 
Imagine your curve is a piece of string with a little loop at one end and the other end going through the loop, so that the string is lying fully inside your region forming a closed curve - now slowly pull the non-looped end through the loop so that the closed curve shrinks within your region. If you can shrink the curve to a point without it leaving the region, and you can always do so no matter how you lay your thread down initially as long as it lies within the region, then your region is simply connected - if on the other hand, as you shrink the curve there comes a point when it must cross the region's boundary (because there is a hole contained within), then your region is not simply connected. You can try using a string on a piece of cardboard and put some obstacle in the middle representing the hole :P if your string initially surrounds the obstacle, then as you shrink it it will end up wrapping itself around the obstacle and you won't be able to shrink it any further.
 
de_brook said:
Please what does it mean that the simple closed curve is continuously deformed to a point?
The deformation is called a homotopy and it is a function (map) that sort of parametrizes possible continuous loops using a parameter from 0 to 1.

For example, if we wanted to deform an ellipse to a circle of radius one, F is the homotopy, and at parameter 0 it gives a function f that describes an ellipse.

we plot the ellipse in a plane, let's say F(0) = f: {x = 3 cos(t), y = 5 sin(t)}

once we run the parameter from 0 to 1, F will spit out different loops between the ellipse and the circle, until finally at 1 we get a circle,

F(1) = g: {x = cos(t), y = sin(t)}We can also deform the ellipse to a single point, the homotopy F will spit out all loops between ellipse and a point. And if there is a hole in space, the continuity will brake.

There is a better way to describe this using fundamental groups, but it's more advanced.
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top