What is the inverse of the function

  • Thread starter Thread starter kmarinas86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Inverse
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation x = ay + by^3 for y in terms of x, two methods are suggested. The first involves substituting y with a new variable z, forming a quadratic in z^3, and then solving for y. The second method compares the equation to a known trigonometric identity, allowing for the use of cosine transformations. Both approaches are applicable for solving cubic equations when the second-degree term is absent. These techniques are valuable for finding the inverse of the function.
kmarinas86
Messages
974
Reaction score
1
I'm running out of ideas:

x=ay+by^3

Does someone here now how to solve for y in terms of x?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
y^3 + \frac{a}{b}y - \frac{x}{b} = 0

Two ways :

1) Substitute y = z - \frac{a}{3bz}. Form a quadratic in z^3, solve for z and find y.

2) Compare equation to the trig identity cos^3 \theta - \frac{3}{4}\cos\theta - \frac{1}{4}\cos 3\theta = 0 while letting y = m\cos\theta then comparing coefficients. With this method, if you have to compute the arccosine of a value greater than one in magnitude, use the identity \cos i\theta = \cosh \theta

These are methods used to solve the general cubic in radicals/trig/hyperbolic trig ratios when the second degree term is missing (or has been eliminated).
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top