What is the justification for the variation of the Lagrangian in an action?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Identity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Variation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the justification for the variation of the Lagrangian in the action integral, defined as S = ∫ L(q, \dot{q}, t) dt. The variation is expressed as δS = ∫ (∂L/∂q δq + ∂L/∂\dot{q} δ\dot{q}) dt. The derivation involves considering a path of least action, x_{l}(t), and applying a Taylor expansion to first order in a small perturbation, ζ(t), leading to the conclusion that δS can be expressed in terms of the partial derivatives of L with respect to q and \dot{q}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with calculus of variations
  • Knowledge of Taylor series expansion
  • Basic concepts of action in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the calculus of variations in detail
  • Explore the principles of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Learn about the Euler-Lagrange equation
  • Investigate applications of the action principle in classical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics and theoretical physics, will benefit from this discussion.

Identity
Messages
151
Reaction score
0
Given an action:

[tex]S = \int L(q,\dot{q},t) \,dt[/tex]

The variation is:

[tex]\delta S = \int \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial q}\delta q+\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}\delta\dot{q}\right)\,dt[/tex]

I'm guessing this is some type of chain rule, but I haven't been able to derive it... how is it justified?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let [itex]x_{l}(t)[/itex] be the path of least action. Consider the path [itex]x_{l}(t) + \zeta (t)[/itex] where [itex]\zeta (t) << 1[/itex]. So, [tex]S(x_{l}(t) + \zeta (t)) = \int_{t_{i}}^{t_{f}}L(x_{l}(t) + \zeta (t); \dot{x_{l}}(t) + \dot{\zeta }(t))dt[/tex] After a taylor expansion to first order in [itex]\boldsymbol{\zeta }[/itex], [tex]S(x_{l}(t) + \zeta (t)) = \int_{t_{i}}^{t_{f}}[L(x_{l}(t), \dot{x_{l}}(t)) + \frac{\partial L}{\partial x(t)}\zeta (t) + \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}(t)}\dot{\zeta }(t)]dt[/tex] (with the expansion terms along the path of least action) so the variation is given by [tex]\delta S = \int_{t_{i}}^{t_{f}}[ \frac{\partial L}{\partial x(t)}\zeta (t) + \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}(t)}\dot{\zeta }(t)]dt[/tex]
 
Ah, thanks for that and the fast reply :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K