What Is the Key Principle of the Michelson/Morley Experiment Apparatus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shark 774
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
AI Thread Summary
The key principle of the Michelson/Morley experiment apparatus revolves around the need for the components to remain stationary relative to each other to ensure accurate measurements. The discussion dismisses options A and B, emphasizing that the critical aspect is not the equal reflection of light or identical mirrors, but rather the stability of the apparatus. The participants argue that if the components moved, it would be impossible to determine whether any observed shifts in the interference pattern were due to the movement or changes in the aether. Although theoretically possible to measure movements, practical limitations make it unfeasible to achieve the required precision. Thus, the consensus highlights the importance of maintaining a fixed relationship among the apparatus components for valid results.
Shark 774
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Which one of the statements below specifies the critical basis of the apparatus used in the Michelson/Morley experiment?
A) The half-silvered mirror must reflect exactly half the light.
B) Mirror 1 and mirror 2 must be identical.
C) The distance traveled by light using either path must be equal.
D) The components must not move relative to each other.

I don't think A or B are right. If the different distances were known C would be fine. If the relative speeds and distances between parts were known then D should also be fine, I would think. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
D is not fine. If the components of the interferometer moved, and you observed a shift in the interference pattern, how would you know whether the shift was due to the components moving or due to the aether changing direction relative to the device? In theory, you can precisely measure the movements of the interferometer's components and account for them. In practice, it's impossible to measure sub-micrometer movements that precisely.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top