What is the Kuratowski Definition of an Ordered Pair in Set Notation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gear300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Pair
Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
The Kuratowski definition of the ordered pair is (a,b) = {{a},{a,b}}...this sort of lost me...how did they define an ordered pair (in which order of elements matters) using set notation (how does this definition work)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
An ordered pair (a,b) is supposed to be some object with this property:

(a,b) = (c,d) if and only if a=c and b=d.

What it actually *is* we don't care, as long as it has this property. Kuratowski wrote down his definition as something that has this property.
 
g_edgar said:
An ordered pair (a,b) is supposed to be some object with this property:

(a,b) = (c,d) if and only if a=c and b=d.

What it actually *is* we don't care, as long as it has this property. Kuratowski wrote down his definition as something that has this property.

I see...I thought they were defining (a,b) with the expression. So, in that sense, the expression does not show that order matters, right?
 
Gear300 said:
I see...I thought they were defining (a,b) with the expression. So, in that sense, the expression does not show that order matters, right?

Yes it does. Notice that if a is not equal to b, the RHS becomes {{b}, {b,a}} which is definitely not equal to {{a}, {a,b}}. Also, if {{a}, {a,b}} = {{x}, {x,y}}, then necessarily a = x and b = y.

This is just a way of capturing the notion of ordered pairs with a set-theoretic definition. What ordered pairs actually are, like g_edgar said, doesn't really matter: as long your notion/definition of them has the desired properties, then there is no harm done.
 
I see...Thanks for the replies...but isn't {{a},{a,b}} just another way of writing {a,b}?
 
Gear300 said:
I see...Thanks for the replies...but isn't {{a},{a,b}} just another way of writing {a,b}?

No... {a,b} is not the same as {{a}, {a,b}}. The members of the first set are a and b, the members of the second are {a} and {a,b}. The members of the second set are NOT a and b, if this is what you are implying.
 
Gear300 said:
I see...Thanks for the replies...but isn't {{a},{a,b}} just another way of writing {a,b}?
{1,3} is the same as {3,1}. But {{1},{1,3}} is not the same as {{3},{3,1}}. Kuratowski's definition basically states that there are two elements and distinguishes between the two, thus giving an order.
 
Thus, the elements are different...I think I see what's going on to a better extent. Thanks for the replies.
 
Back
Top