What is the Largest Ratio R/r for Equilibrium in a Frictionless Spherical Bowl?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ronaldor9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the largest ratio R/r for equilibrium when a fourth sphere is placed on top of three identical spheres resting at the bottom of a frictionless spherical bowl. The focus is on the forces acting on the spheres and the conditions necessary for equilibrium, involving both vector decomposition and geometric considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that equilibrium means the fourth sphere is supported by the three others, identifying various forces acting on the spheres.
  • Another participant expresses difficulty in decomposing the forces into x- and y-components, indicating a need for further clarification on vector analysis.
  • A different participant notes that equilibrium requires not only the sum of forces to be zero but also questions whether vector products are relevant to the solution.
  • One participant claims to have derived the ratio R/r = 3, explaining that the weight of the upper ball is distributed among the three supporting balls along the edges of a tetrahedron formed by the centers of the spheres.
  • The same participant elaborates on the geometric relationship between the spheres and the bowl, asserting that the bowl must touch at a specific height on the supporting balls to maintain equilibrium.
  • There is an invitation for others to validate or challenge the proposed solution, indicating an openness to discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not reached a consensus on the solution, as there are differing views on the methods of analysis and the interpretation of equilibrium conditions. Some participants are seeking clarification and further exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the decomposition of forces and the application of vector analysis. The discussion reflects various assumptions about the geometric configuration and the forces involved in the equilibrium of the spheres.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and enthusiasts of physics and engineering, particularly those interested in mechanics, equilibrium conditions, and geometric configurations involving spheres.

ronaldor9
Messages
91
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Three identical spheres of radius r are at rest at the bottom of a spherical bowl of radius R. If a fourth sphere is placed on top, what is the largest ratio R/r for equilibrium if there is no friction?


Homework Equations



Obviously F_net=0 since the sphere are in equilibrium, however I'm not sure how to start. Could somebody tell me how to begin?

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess by "equilibrum" they mean that the 4th sphere is supported by the three other.
There are three forces (Fa1,Fa2,Fa3) where the three sphere touches the big sphere.
There are three other forces (Fb1,Fb2,Fb3) where the three sphere support the 4th.
There are also forces between the three spheres (Fc12,Fc23,Fc13).
The vertical component of forces Fbn should be enough to support the 4th ball.
Each spheres have a weight which can be expressed by its force F0.
 
Yeah that's as far as I was able to get. I'm having troubles decomposing each of those vectors into x- and y-components.
 
It isn't just that sum forces is zero. What other sum must be zero for equilibrium? I have solved this problem using accurate engineering drawing to help me understand it, and can now see the solution can be obtained also by other means, including vectors if you must. Could this be about vector products as well as sums?
 
The answer is R/r = 3

The stack sets up a tetrahedron between the centers of mass of each of the 4 balls. The weight of upper ball is split between each of the 3 supporting balls along the edges of the tetrahedron. If you traveled down one edge of the tetrahedron, you'd reach the center of the supporting ball after 2r and would need to travel another r to reach the required contact point on the bowl. Why is it the required contact point? Because the bowl has to touch at least as high as this point on the support ball (although it could touch above this point, but that would be a smaller bowl) in order to counteract and cancel the component of the weight (1/3 of mg) that is held by this third of the tetrahedron. This cancellation is required for equilibrium. Since the normal from the bowl has to be NORMAL to the bowl, it must be orthogonal to the bowl surface and hence point back toward the center of the sphere that contains the bowl. That means that the large sphere has its center at the top of the tetrahedron (the centre of mass of the upper sphere) and must have a radius of 3r. So R=3r or R/r=3.

Anyone buying this?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K