What is the limit of k over k squared?

  • Thread starter Thread starter icystrike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Zero
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the limit of k over k squared as k approaches infinity. It is clarified that while the limit of k itself does not exist because it approaches infinity, the limit of k/k^2 simplifies to 1/k, which equals 0 as k increases. Participants emphasize that infinity is not a finite number, thus the limit cannot be classified as indeterminate. The conversation also distinguishes between valid limits and indeterminate forms, asserting that k/k^2 falls under the latter category but resolves to 0. Ultimately, the limit of k/k^2 as k approaches infinity is confirmed to be 0.
icystrike
Messages
444
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/3204/84956253.jpg

This is not a homework.. I am wondering if it should really be zero or indeterminant form and i need a explanation(dont hesitate to quote from theorems)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


The first two, \lim_{k\to\infty} 0= 0 and \lim_{k\to\infty} 0\cdot k= 0 are correct- they are both the limit of the sequence 0, 0, 0, ...

The third one is not "inderminant"- it does not exist because \lim_{k\to\infty} k does not exist.
 


Do pardon me.. why \lim_{k\to\infty} k does not exist?

(I'm suspecting the determinant form of the indeterminant is 0)
 
Last edited:


\lim_{k \to \infty} k = \infty

The limit doesn't actually exist, since \infty isn't a finite number. All this says is that as k gets large without bound, then (obviously) k gets large without bound. This is not one of the indeterminate forms (no such word as indeterminant) such as the following:
<br /> \left[\frac{\infty}{\infty}\right]<br /> \left[\infty - \infty\right]\\<br /> \left[\frac{0}{0}\right]\\<br /> \left[1^{\infty}\right]<br />
 


Mark44 said:
\lim_{k \to \infty} k = \infty

The limit doesn't actually exist, since \infty isn't a finite number. All this says is that as k gets large without bound, then (obviously) k gets large without bound. This is not one of the indeterminate forms (no such word as indeterminant) such as the following:
<br /> \left[\frac{\infty}{\infty}\right]<br /> \left[\infty - \infty\right]\\<br /> \left[\frac{0}{0}\right]\\<br /> \left[1^{\infty}\right]<br />

However, we can always change into
attachment.php?attachmentid=29483&stc=1&d=1288370729.jpg
which is indeed 0/0
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    1.4 KB · Views: 485


The rule

\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{x_ny_n}=\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{x_n}\lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}{y_n}

which you use, does not always hold. It only holds if the two limits on the right-hand side exists. And this is not the case here...
 


icystrike said:
However, we can always change into
attachment.php?attachmentid=29483&stc=1&d=1288370729.jpg
which is indeed 0/0
Indeed it is not. The denominator is approaching 0, but the numerator is 1.
 


There is a 0 outside the limit won't it make it 0/0?
Secondly, if limit of k as k tends to infinity does not exist, how about limit of k/k^2 as k tends to inifinity? ( since you can break up the limit to (lim k)/(lim k^2)
 


That font is so small in that thumbnail that I took it to be 0 - the rest.

In any case, I don't see the point in going to complicated expressions just to represent
\lim_{k \to \infty} k = \infty.

In one sense, which is what HallsOfIvy was saying, the limit doesn't exist, since infinity isn't a value in the real number system. To say that the limit is infinity just means that the value of k gets larger and larger as k gets larger and larger.

\lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{k}{k^2} = \lim_{k \to \infty} \frac{1}{k} = 0

The first expression is one of the indeterminate forms I mentioned earlier in this thread. It can be simplified to the second expression above, which has a limit of 0.
 
Back
Top