What is the linear acceleration of the .67kg mass?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the linear acceleration of a 0.67 kg mass connected to a pulley system. The user is analyzing the forces acting on the mass and pulley, noting that the tension in the rope differs on both sides due to the applied force of 25N being greater than the weight of the mass (6.7N). They plan to use Newton's second law (F=ma) and the moment of inertia for the pulley, which is identified as a solid disk. The user expresses uncertainty about whether they need to complete all parts of the problem to find the linear acceleration. Ultimately, the focus is on determining the acceleration of the mass while considering the dynamics of the pulley system.
Up_Creek
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Ok


here's the question;

"You pull downward with a force of 25N on a rope that passes over a disk-shaped pulley of mass 1.3 kg and radius 0.075m. The other end of the rope is attached to a .67-kg mass. (a) Us the tension in the rope the same on both sides of the pulley? If not, which side has the largest tension? (b) Find the tension in the rope on both sides of the pulley.

(c) Find the linear acceleration of the .67kg mass.

Ok, we're using g=10 m/s so the pulley is 13N and the mass is 6.7N.

I've gotten all the forces drawn in but I'm kind of sketchy about how to get the answer. I know I need to combine several equations to find t, tension.
So in total I have this attached image here.

The steps I know I need are as follows

1.) Draw a picture
2.) isolate bodies
3.) draw in forces
4.) resolve forces

I know i'll need to use F=ma. I'm assuming that hopefully I can re-work that so I get a=F/m? Also, as (c) was the only question assigned, do I need to do (a) and (b) to get (c)?

a rough outline of what I think

Since the 25N force is greater than the 6.7N mass, the pulley will accelerate counter-clockwise (or 'out' according to the right hand rule, not sure why that's important, or even if it is) So i'll take counter-clockwise to be positive. Tension must be down, since rope cannot push. Obviously the tension is different on both sides of the pulley, or they wouldn't word the question like that, and the force on the 25N side would create more tension on that side too, right?


Anyway, I need to find the linear acceleration of the 6.7N mass. Linear acceleration I think would be acceleration in the y direction, right?


Jordan Veale
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    3.6 KB · Views: 543
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It has come to my attention that i'll also need moment of inertia, I

the pulley would be a solid disk, so I = 1/2 mr^2

So

I = .5(13N)(.075m^2)
I = .037

that's just taking into account the weight of the pulley alone. Or do I have to add the weight of the mass and the 25N force too?
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top