What is the Mass of a Box in a Car's Trunk Based on Rear Shock Compression?

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shock
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of a box placed in a car's trunk, which compresses the rear shocks by 7.00 cm. The rear shocks are treated as springs with a spring constant of 35,000 N/m. The problem requires using the relationship between spring compression and force to determine the mass, factoring in gravitational acceleration at 9.80 m/s². Participants clarify that the shocks function as springs in this context, emphasizing the mechanics involved. Understanding the compression of the springs is essential for solving the problem accurately.
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



When a box of unknown mass is placed into a trunk of a car, both rear shocks are compressed a distance of 7.00cm. If we assume the two rear shocks are made from springs, each with a spring constant of 35,000.00N/m, what is the mass of the box? (Assume g = 9.80m/s2).


The Attempt at a Solution



I don't even understand the problem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Shock" = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_absorber" . Just think of them as being vertically oriented springs with the mass placed right on top of them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The car is mounted to the wheels by way of springs. Actually it's springs in parallel with dampers that add friction so the car doesn't keep bouncing up and down indefinitely after hitting a bump. The combination is called a "shock absorber" for obvious reasons. In short form, "shocks". In modern parlance we tend to refer to the damper as the shock and call the spring a spring... But for purposes of this question, the shocks are springs. Does that help? :smile:

The problem is saying that when a heavy box is placed in the rear of the car, the springs at the back are compressed by 7cm. Have fun!
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top