What Is the Mass Percentage of Each Component in a SrCO3 and BaCO3 Mixture?

  • Thread starter Thread starter suspenc3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
To determine the mass percentage of each component in the SrCO3 and BaCO3 mixture, the total mass of the mixture is 1.60g, and the reaction with hydrochloric acid produces 0.421g of carbon dioxide. The molar masses of SrCO3 and BaCO3 are needed to relate the amount of CO2 produced to the original components. By calculating the moles of CO2 and using stoichiometry, the individual masses of SrCO3 and BaCO3 can be found. This will allow for the calculation of the mass percentages of each component in the mixture.
suspenc3
Messages
400
Reaction score
0
A certain mixture contains only SrCO3 and BaCO3. When 1.60g of this mixture is treated with hydrochloric acid, 0.421g of carbon dioxide gas is liberated. Calculate the mass percentage of each component in the mixture. Reaction of the carbonate with the acid:

MCO3(s)+2H(aq)+--->M+2(aq) + H2O(l) +CO2(g).

Im completely lost on this problem, its kinda the same as the last I guess.

Any help will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are your thoughts/ideas on this question? You need to show some work before you get help.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top