What is the mathematical concept behind the shear in gravitational lensing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zephyr5050
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi Vectors
zephyr5050
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

Sorry about the crappy title. I'm actually not sure what the call the thing I'm here to ask about, which is why I'm here.

In the process of reading about gravitational lensing, I've run across an odd mathematical thing that I just don't know how to handle. When a spherical galaxy get's lensed by another galaxy it gets distorted from its original spherical shape into an elliptical shape. People define a parameter known as the shear, which in some sense is a vector whose magnitude tells you the semi-major axis of the elliptical shape, and the direction is the direction of the ellipse from some arbitrary reference point.

Now the issue is, the shear points in two directions. Think of a vector along the major axis of an ellipse that points in both directions. This means this isn't really a vector at all, and as such it has to be handled differently. This usually results in lots of random 2's thrown into equations to account for this property.

I've never really come across this mathematical object before and don't even know what to call it. I heard someone mention the name "polar" but googling that doesn't get me anywhere. Does anyone have any idea what object I'm talking about and can explain them further or reference me to a good site/book about them?

Thanks for your help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Sounds a lot like elements of a real projective space (take the n-dimensional vectors, 0 excluded, and call two of them "equal" if they're scalar multiples of each other.) For instance, a vector v is "equal" to -v since v=-1*-v.

Not quite, though, since two vectors are still considered "distinct" in this context if they have different magnitudes. You'd probably want the product space of RP##^n## with the positive real numbers to allow for said distinct magnitudes.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top