What is the maximum refractive index for lens numerical aperture?

  • Thread starter Thread starter u0362565
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lens Numerical
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the maximum refractive index for lens numerical aperture and its impact on resolution, as defined by Rayleigh's equation. While immersion oil (n = 1.515) is commonly used, it is not the highest refractive index available; solid immersion lenses can achieve indices up to 3.5. However, materials with such high indices may not be transparent in the visible spectrum, limiting their practical use. Alternative imaging methods, such as super-resolution techniques, can provide better resolution without relying solely on refractive index improvements. Overall, exploring advanced imaging techniques is suggested as a more effective approach than seeking higher refractive indices.
u0362565
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have a question about resolution as defined by rayleigh's equation r = 0.61 x lambda/numerical aperture

The maximum half angle of acceptance of a lens is 90 degrees and the sine of this is 1. At this point the only thing that can increase the value of the denominator in the equation is to increase the refractive index of the imaging medium e.g. Immersion oil. So if you could find a medium with a higher refractive index than immersion oil (1.515) then according to the equation this would make the minimum resolvable distance between two points smaller. This would also mean tho that any other medium between the object and lens would need to have the same refractive index or at least close to minimise spherical aberration. So I'm guessing immersion oil is as good as we can do? But why is that?

Many thanks.
 
Science news on Phys.org
u0362565 said:
<snip>So I'm guessing immersion oil is as good as we can do?

For far-field linear imaging, the limiting factor for resolution is indeed the refractive index- but immersion oil does not have the highest possible refractive index. Besides other fluids, solid immersion lenses can go up to n = 3.5 or so.

There is a great deal of work demonstrating imaging with resolution exceeding the Abbe limit using alternate methods (so-called super-resolution or non-diffraction-limited imaging), typically applied to fluorescence methods (RESOLFT, STORM, FPALM, etc.) but structured illumination and near-field scanning methods can be used more generally.
 
Thanks andy, i haven't heard of solid immersion lenses before, i'll look into that.
 
Keep in mind that the "immersion" material needs to be transparent at whatever wavelength you want to image at. Semiconductors with n > 3.5 are opaque in the visible. Diamond has the highest refractive index that is transparent in the visible at around ~2.

Honestly, the amount of effort required is not worth the marginal improvement in resolution. Much better to investigate schemes such as structured illumination mentioned by Andy.

Claude.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top