What is the maximum speed and acceleration of a train on a big dipper?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lemon
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum speed and acceleration of a train on a big dipper, focusing on energy conservation principles. The train descends 20 meters, converting gravitational potential energy (GPE) into kinetic energy (KE) at the dip, where the radius of curvature is 20 meters. Key calculations involve determining maximum speed at the dip, centripetal acceleration, and the normal force on a passenger. The collision with a stationary train complicates the scenario, requiring consideration of momentum conservation and energy loss during the collision. The final query addresses how far the combined train will rise after the dip, emphasizing the transition from kinetic to gravitational potential energy.
lemon
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
Hi:
I have a question to answer but I don't think I have enough information.
I know I have to consider that GPE goes to KE, with max.velocity at the bottom of the dip. I think that the amplitude is the radius of the dip. And I think it is important to think about Total energy is proportional to amplitude squared. But... I'm stuck how to start this without knowing the mass really.
any help appreciated. thank you.

On a fairground big dipper, a train free-wheels down a steep incline into a dip before rising out of the dip. The track at the dip has a radius of curvature of 20.0 m. Assuming the train is almost stationary at the top of the incline before descending, and given that the train drops 20.0m, calculate
(i) the maximum speed the train could have at the dip.
(ii) the centripetal acceleration of the train as it passes through the dip.
(iii) the normal reaction force on a passenger of mass 75kg at this point.
Unfortunately, another train is stationary at the bottom of the dip and a collision occurs in which the two trains move as one up the rise following the dip.
(iv) how far vertically will the combined two-part train go up the rise?



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the equations for gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy? Can you write out the conservation of energy formula?
 
Thank you:
I have done some calculations - if you could check please.
The last part of the question is...
Not sure. I started with conservation of momentum and collisions, but actually, I think it doesn't apply here. The question says 'how far vertically'. So again, is it a change back from KE to GPE? And what about any loss of energy in the collision?

attachment.php?attachmentid=24474&d=1268901501.gif
 

Attachments

  • Q10A4.gif
    Q10A4.gif
    7.3 KB · Views: 757
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top