What is the Meaning of Taking Square? - Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Naimbora
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Square
Naimbora
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Taking square?

Why do we need to take square? What does it mean? For instance, calculating energy, why do we need to take square of the velocity or taking square of time in some other formulas?

In general, what is the mathematical meaning of taking square?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


Think dimension? If I told you that area of your room was 50 feet what would that mean to you?
 


Naimbora said:
Why do we need to take square? What does it mean? For instance, calculating energy, why do we need to take square of the velocity or taking square of time in some other formulas?

In general, what is the mathematical meaning of taking square?
The mathematical meaning of taking the square (of a number) is simply multiplying a number by itself, raising it to the second power etc. In the case of a vector this means taking the scalar product of the vector with itself.

The physical interpretation on the other hand is something completely different.
 


Hootenanny said:
The physical interpretation on the other hand is something completely different.

Ok, i think that i asked the question in a wrong way.. I did mean the physical interpretation of "taking square" as Hootenanny said above.

Could you help me about this question, at least a personal idea or expression?
 


Naimbora said:
Could you help me about this question, at least a personal idea or expression?
There is nothing particularly special about a squared quantity, the fact the some quantity is squared simply arises as a matter of course from their derivations.

Of course, some people would say that its strange that so many physical laws contain powers of two; but conversely there are many that don't. Personally, I don't feel that there is any special physical interpretation to physical laws or equations containing terms to the second power.

Of course, one can draw conclusions from certainly formulae. For example, you cite kinetic energy; from this equation one can conclude firstly that kinetic energy is a scalar quantity and secondly that kinetic energy is always positive.
 


Thank you, Hootenanny. I seem to get barked at everytime I make the point that mathematical concepts do NOT have "physical meaning".
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
11K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Back
Top