What is the meaning of the equation Vgrav = constant - 1/2 v2?

AI Thread Summary
The equation Vgrav = constant - 1/2 v2 represents the relationship between gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy in a uniform gravitational field. It derives from the equation Epotential = Etotal - Ekinetic, where gravitational potential is defined as potential energy per mass. The discussion highlights the distinction between potential and potential energy, clarifying that gravitational potential is often denoted as U rather than V. The equation also connects to concepts of gravitational force and energy conservation. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of consistent terminology in physics education.
Joe09
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I did a quick search but didnt find anything relevant so I apologise if this has been covered.

My A2 Physics book says the following:

Epotential = Etotal - Ekinetic

Since the kinetic energy is 1/2 mv2, and the gravitational potential Vgrav is Epotential/m, dividing this equation by m gives

Vgrav = constant - 1/2 v2

My question is, the book does not go into any more detail and i am unsure what this equation is ment to actually be. I think it means G but i am unsure.

Appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Joe09! Welcome to PF! :smile:

There's a slightly confusing difference between potential and potential energy …

electric potential is potential energy per charge, and gravitational potential is potential energy per mass …

that's why they divided Epotential by m. :wink:

Gravitational potential (in a uniform gravitational field) is U = gh.

(and btw I think we normally use U rather than V for potential)
 
Thankyou for the welcome.

Of course how silly of me!

The equation:

Epotential = Etotal - Ekinetic

is equivalent to:

GMm/R = mc2 - 1/2 mv2

So when the physics book divides the equation by m we arrive at:

GM/R = c2 - 1/2 v2

which is equivalent to:

Vgrav = constant - 1/2 v2



I tell ya, working with integrals all day confudles the mind :blushing:

U? Oh ok, it be nice if the worlds scientists/exam boards/teaching curriculums could agree on a universal symbol. Unless its only the UK which uses V :rolleyes:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top