MHB What is the minimal distance between y=e^x and y=\ln x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The minimal distance between the functions y=e^x and y=ln x occurs at the points (0,1) and (1,0), where their tangents are parallel to the line y=x. These points are where the graphs of the two functions come closest to each other. The calculated minimal distance between these two points is √2. This distance reflects the symmetrical relationship of the functions as mirror images across the line y=x. Understanding this geometric relationship is key to determining the minimal distance.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
What is the minimal distance between $$y=e^x$$ and $$y=\ln x$$?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
What is the minimal distance between $$y=e^x$$ and $$y=\ln x$$?
The graphs of those two functions are mirror images of each other in the line $y=x$. So the minimal distance between them will be the distance between the points where they come closest to that line. That will occur at the points where the tangents to the graphs are parallel to the line (which has slope $1$, of course), in other words at the points $(0,1)$ (on the exponential) and $(1,0)$ (on the logarithm). The minimal distance is therefore the distance between those two points, which is $\sqrt2$.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top