What is the Mistake in My Electric Potential Problem Calculation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a calculation error in an electric potential problem involving two point charges. The user incorrectly equated voltage and energy, leading to a significant discrepancy in the results. It was noted that both charges will move slightly during their closest approach, which was not accounted for in the initial calculation. The importance of maintaining consistent units throughout the problem was emphasized to avoid such mistakes. Overall, the user needs to reassess their approach to the electric potential and the dynamics of the charges involved.
Henry Shi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble understanding this problem in Electric Potential. (Source: OpenStax, Chapter 19)
Now consider another system of two point charges. One has a mass of 1000 kg and a charge of 50.0 µC, and is initially stationary. The other has a mass of 1.00 kg, a charge of 10.0 µC, and is initially traveling directly at the first point charge at 10.0 m/s from very far away. What will be the closest approach of these two objects to each other?

Here is my attempt:
The internal energy of the system is conserved. Therefore, we have:
KE1+PE1=KE2+PE2
The potential energy at time 1 is essentially 0, and the kinetic energy at time 2 is 0. PE=qV. Therefore, the equation becomes:
0.5(1)(10)2 + 0 = 0 + (10*10-6)V
50=(10-5)V
5,000,000=V
This number is implausible. I also used V=kq1q2/R
5,000,000=kq1q2/R
5,000,000=(9*10-9)(10*10-6)(50*10-6) / R
Solving for R, I got R=9*10-9m

However, the correct answer was R=9*10-2 m, or 9 cm.

What did I do wrong?
 

Attachments

  • CNX_APPhysics_19_M1_PntChgB.jpg
    CNX_APPhysics_19_M1_PntChgB.jpg
    7.2 KB · Views: 544
Physics news on Phys.org
Henry Shi said:
and the kinetic energy at time 2 is 0
Both will move a bit at the time of closest approach, but that is a small correction, not the 7 orders of magnitude difference you got.
Henry Shi said:
This number is implausible.
Why?
Henry Shi said:
I also used V=kq1q2/R
You used V as voltage before. Now you use it as energy and set it equal. That doesn't work. If you would have worked with units, you would have spotted the problem immediately.
Henry Shi said:
Solving for R
There is another mistake in this step.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top