What is the motion of a particle that fails the velocity selector?

AI Thread Summary
In mass spectrometry, velocity selectors utilize perpendicular electric and magnetic fields to select charged particles based on their velocity. Particles that do not meet the velocity criteria do not follow a simple path, as they exhibit neither parabolic nor circular motion. Instead, their trajectory can be described mathematically as a cycloid, with specific equations detailing their motion over time. The equations incorporate initial velocity, magnetic field strength, and electric field strength to illustrate the particle's path. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing particle behavior in mass spectrometry applications.
Lamarr
Messages
52
Reaction score
1
in mass spectrometry, velocity selectors are used to select charged particles with a certain velocity.

They use perpendicular electric and magnetic fields. Particles whose velocities equal the ratio of the electric field strength to magnetic flux density are not deflected and are thus "selected"

but what is the motion of a particle which is not selected?

It is neither parabolic nor circular. What is the mathematical equation to describe the particle's path wrt time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
should i move this to the engineering section instead?
 
when the ions pass into the magnetic field section they have circular arc paths.
You can imagine the slit being moveable, slide it across and it selects the ions with the appropriate arc... ie speed.
edit
surprised you have not had any other input to your question.
 
Both a parabola and a circle are a good approximation for the path in the velocity selector. If your electric and magnetic fields fill the whole space, you will get the sum of a linear and a circular motion.

Edit: See Philip Woods post for equations, and I can confirm them.
 
Last edited:
Edit: I've changed the notation to bring out the Physics better.

Its path is a cycloid.

Suppose you launch it from the origin, with initial velocity v0 in the x-direction. Let the magnetic field be B in the z-direction, and the electric field E in the y-direction. Then, unless I've slipped somewhere (quite possible):

x=\frac{1}{\omega}\left(v_0 - v_{eq}\right)\:sin{\omega t} + v_{eq}t
y=\frac{1}{\omega}\left(v_0 - v_{eq}\right)\:\left(cos{\omega t} - 1\right)

in which \omega = \frac{qB}{m} ,

and v_{eq} = \frac{E}{B} = speed particle would have to have to be undeflected.

Working can be supplied on thumb-nail if wanted.
 
Last edited:
Lamarr: is this what you wanted?
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top