What is the name of two harmonics combined ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter harmon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a term for the interval created by combining two harmonic intervals, specifically when multiplying their frequency ratios. The user is exploring the concept of multiharmonics in physics but is uncertain about its definition and applicability in music theory. They note that traditional interval naming systems based on the 12-note scale do not adequately cover the vast combinations of ratios derived from harmonics. The user highlights the limitations of current music scales, which often do not align with just intonation. The inquiry seeks clarity on terminology and resources related to these musical and physical concepts.
harmon
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear people.

I am working on music theory and I am making a program to derive musical scales, but I need a name for the interval of combining to harmonic intervals. Etc. if I multiply 4/3 with 5/4 I get 5/3. But what is the correct words for such intervals (except that a few of them actually have names in music theory and the ratio 5/3 is named a major sixth, but I am looking for a name for the whole group of such intervals) ? I have seen that there is something called a multiharmonic in physics, but I haven't been able to find a definition of that word. I don't think that partials or overtones are precise words as the cover a lot more ! Can anyone please tell me the definition of multiharmonic and if that is not the word I am searching for, what is the word for intervals such as 5/3. Do anyone knows about good in depth texts or books about the subject.

Thanks

Harmon
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi

Thanks for you reply. Actually tables such as the one you are referring to are based on the 12 note systems normally used in western music, and are only covering a few of the intervals coming from combining two of the harmonics. Also only the just intonation gives the precise ratios, but are not used in the music scales used (normally) today, as it is not possible (at least no one has done it) to make them fit into a 12 note system. Therefore our music scales are not really harmonic, which many consider a problem ! If you for example combine all the harmonics from the 3. to the 10. you will get 300 combinations or ratios (of which a few of them have equal values or are precise harmonics). My question is what to call these combinations. And since this a forum for physics, I am hoping that someone will explain what physicists mean with the term multiharmonics used in some text covering advanced physics.

Kind regards

Harmon
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Back
Top