What is the newest installment of 'Random Thoughts' on Physics Forums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Random Thoughts
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion revolves around the latest installment of the "Random Thoughts" thread on Physics Forums, highlighting various topics including critiques of documentary programming on the History Channel and National Geographic's recent ownership change. Participants express concerns about the quality of content in documentaries and share personal anecdotes, such as a humorous incident involving a clogged kitchen extractor fan. The conversation also touches on mathematical discussions regarding prime numbers and cultural observations about societal norms and language use.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with documentary programming and its impact on public knowledge.
  • Basic understanding of prime numbers and mathematical proofs.
  • Awareness of cultural commentary and societal norms.
  • Knowledge of language variations and their implications in communication.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the impact of media ownership on documentary content quality.
  • Research advanced mathematical concepts related to prime numbers.
  • Investigate cultural differences in language use and societal expectations.
  • Learn about the effects of solar irradiation in different geographical locations.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for media analysts, educators in mathematics, cultural commentators, and anyone interested in the intersection of media, society, and education.

  • #6,841
mathwonk said:
me too, maybe if e1,e2,... is an infinite sequence of unit length independent vectors, and T(ej) = j, then although ej/j-->0, T(ej/j) = 1, for all j.

(It seems I still know Banach spaces better than I know trig and one vbl calc.)
My conclusion was that since, given how I was taught, I did not understand anything, if one wants to understand, one should be taught the opposite to how I was. Of course that also may not be sufficient. Maybe it was actually my fault that I did not think and work hard enough, ask questions, look for examples? Nahhh...
I understood it a bit differently. The norm of the operator is the sup over the unit ball. We normalize a countable subset of the basis so that ||e_i||=1 . Then we declare T(e_i)=i (Standard norm on the Reals/Image), so that the Sup of the images goes to ## \infty ##. But I like your way too, to have more than one approach to see it be more understandable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #6,842
I hear constant wailing by dogs every time they hear firemen alarms. Wonder if something could be done about it. I am not a crazy Peta person but they seem to go through a bad time.
 
  • #6,843
WWGD said:
I hear constant wailing by dogs every time they hear firemen alarms. Wonder if something could be done about it. I am not a crazy Peta person but they seem to go through a bad time.
I think they probably enjoy the opportunity to sing along. I knew a dog who would start the moment he saw a violin case being opened, even before playing started. He definitely hated being shut out of the room.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, BillTre and WWGD
  • #6,844
More on absurdly accurate (human) population counts:
The population of Mexico is 130,009,263...wait! , I was just notified 2 people just died and 4 were born. Make that 130,009,265. Why don't they just tell you130 million, or at least 130,009,000?
 
  • #6,847
Sorry if this is trivial: If I have an Excel spreadsheet: Is it possible to alphabetize ( " A to Z") several columns simultaneously? I remember once trying to do that and only one column was alphabetized, screwing up the whole spreadsheet. The process of alfa is clearly not reversible unless you notice right away and do a 'Ctrl+Z".
 
  • #6,848
Not without VBA, as far as I know. You can sort multiple columns in the sense that you could have a surname column and first name column and sort the table by surname then first name (i.e., Smith, Jane comes before Smith, John but after Jones, John), but not both columns independently (i.e. so that Jane comes before both Johns and Jones comes before both Smiths).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #6,849
If anyone knows a way, please do say. There have been a few times it would be useful and I've had to resort to jiggery-pokery due to not being able to do this kind of sort.
 
  • #6,850
Ibix said:
Not without VBA, as far as I know. You can sort multiple columns in the sense that you could have a surname column and first name column and sort the table by surname then first name (i.e., Smith, Jane comes before Smith, John but after Jones, John), but not both columns independently (i.e. so that Jane comes before both Johns and Jones comes before both Smiths).
Thank you. I am not sure I understood your reply well. Say I have names in the order A,C,B and their corresponding last names in the order D , F,E. (Meaning full names are A+D, C+F, B+E) Can I sort , while keeping the match between names and last names, so that we end up with names column in the order A,B,C and last names in the order D,F,E ? ,i.e., the match between names and last names is preserved? Sorry if I misunderstood you.
 
  • #6,851
WWGD said:
Thank you. I am not sure I understood your reply well. Say I have names in the order A,C,B and their corresponding last names in the order D , F,E. (Meaning full names are A+D, C+F, B+E) Can I sort , while keeping the match between names and last names, so that we end up with names column in the order A,B,C and last names in the order D,F,E ? ,i.e., the match between names and last names is preserved? Sorry if I misunderstood you.
Yes. So:
SmithJohn
JonesJohn
SmithJane
can be sorted to get
JonesJohn
SmithJane
SmithJohn
So we've sorted on surname, and used first name to break any ties, if that makes sense. What you can't do in one go is sort the columns independently (breaking the links between first name and surname). So you can't get this:
JonesJane
SmithJohn
SmithJohn
Or, at least, I don't know a way to do it except the obvious select each column one at a time and sort it on its own.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #6,852
Ibix said:
Yes. So:
SmithJohn
JonesJohn
SmithJane
can be sorted to get
JonesJohn
SmithJane
SmithJohn
So we've sorted on surname, and used first name to break and ties, if that makes sense. What you can't do in one go is sort the columns independently (breaking the links between first name and surname). So you can't get this:
JonesJane
SmithJohn
SmithJohn
Or, at least, I don't know a way to do it except the obvious select each column one at a time and sort it on its own.
Excellent, Thank you. After a major screw up in which I shifted down a cell containing cell phones and the last digit of the phone number was shifted by 1 , as part of a pattern, I thought it would be a good idea to ask:

I had a phone number , say 407963225 in cell E41 , but was actual part of row 42, so needed to be moved down to E42. So I selected the cell , moved it down by one row and ended up with phone number 407963226=407963225+1 ; Excel somehow thought in shifting the cell down I was extending a pattern. Happened a few times. Took me a few hours to repair. Point is recent carelssness cost me a good amount of time, so I thought I'd be extra careful. Thanks again, Ibix.
 
  • #6,853
WWGD said:
Excellent, Thank you. After a major screw up in which I shifted down a cell containing cell phones and the last digit of the phone number was shifted by 1 , as part of a pattern, I thought it would be a good idea to ask:

I had a phone number , say 407963225 in cell E41 , but was actual part of row 42, so needed to be moved down to E42. So I selected the cell , moved it down by one row and ended up with phone number 407963226=407963225+1 ; Excel somehow thought in shifting the cell down I was extending a pattern. Happened a few times. Took me a few hours to repair. Point is recent carelssness cost me a good amount of time, so I thought I'd be extra careful. Thanks again, Ibix.
I remember once meeting someone interning in a company on Excel. As in 'So and So, the Excel Intern'. Seemed strange, but now I can see how/why that can be.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix
  • #6,854
WWGD said:
After a major screw up in which I shifted down a cell containing cell phones and the last digit of the phone number was shifted by 1 , as part of a pattern, I thought it would be a good idea to ask
Ugh. I really hate Excel for doing exactly this kind of smart-but-not-smart-enough kind of thing. But I still have to use it for far too much stuff because I've no better general purpose tool available...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD
  • #6,855
1618870998796.png
 
  • #6,856
I finally realized this guy meant Coup D'etat and not Crudite. Conversation started making sense.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Klystron
  • #6,857
  • #6,858
Keep hearing everyone saying older music was better. I suspect it has to see with the fact that bad songs from long ago did not survive, so those who did make it seem better. Survivorship bias. Edit: Just like those who say : Look at how well-adapted all animals are. No, you're seeing those who are well-adapted , so that they made it. Same for songs.

I mean, I am nowhere near being a hip guy, going to the latest clubs, but I don't remember hearing any music from 90s and on, being piped in in any public place. All 60s-90s.
 
Last edited:
  • #6,859
Ok, a special on pickles, so I bought them and will try them on my sandwich. And at the German place, they're advertising The Best of the Wurst. Getting the specials is a way of randomizing the food I eat, which is supposedly a good, healthy thing to do; to rotate nutrients.
 
Last edited:
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary
  • #6,860
WWGD said:
Ok, a special on pickles, so I bought them and will try them on my sandwich. And at the German place, they're advertising The Best of the Wurst. Getting the specials is a way of randomizing the food I eat, which is supposedly a good, healthy thing to do; to rotate nutrients.
What part are you skeptical about, Keith? You know I take some license with my entries here ;).
 
  • #6,861
WWGD said:
What part are you skeptical about, Keith?
Here, the specials tend to be less healthy and nutritious.
 
  • #6,862
Keith_McClary said:
Here, the specials tend to be less healthy and nutritious.
Could be. I select the ones that are reasonably healthy, not just any one. But valid point. They may not be the best, but hardly the Wurst ;).
 
  • #6,863
Physics exams are so rude, it's always "calculate this" or "show that" and never "please calculate this" or "please show that". From now on I refuse to do a question if it does not ask nicely.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: WWGD and Ibix
  • #6,864
etotheipi said:
Physics exams are so rude, it's always "calculate this" or "show that" and never "please calculate this" or "please show that". From now on I refuse to do a question if it does not ask nicely.
Even worse: they talk about quantum mechanics. Ever seen a quantum car? What do these mechanics repair?
 
  • #6,865
Always thought it would be interesting if one of these late night interview shows decided to interview random everyday people, instead of celebrities. Like Joe the plumber.
 
  • #6,866
WWGD said:
Even worse: they talk about quantum mechanics. Ever seen a quantum car? What do these mechanics repair?
I always feel uncertain about my quantum mechanic's estimates.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre, WWGD and Keith_McClary
  • #6,867
DrGreg said:
I always feel uncertain about my quantum mechanic's estimates.
Just don't let your cat hang out in your shop . You will never know if it's dead or alive ( pushing it to its limits; probably way beyond).
 
  • #6,868
I did not accept the invitation of the Stoic Philosophy group to join them. They didn't seem to care much; " That's Life", but cared more than the Nihilists.
 
  • #6,869
I intend to join the Procrastination Society one day.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #6,870
DrGreg said:
I intend to join the Procrastination Society one day.
I thought about it. But I think I will do it on Monday.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2K ·
66
Replies
2K
Views
62K
  • · Replies 3K ·
89
Replies
3K
Views
163K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K