- 20,646
- 27,823
So it has been you, who gave the neighbor these nuts? </duck and cover ...>Sophia said:Don't like those with nuts because the nuts "disturb" me and I can't enjoy the taste of chocolate.
Last edited:
So it has been you, who gave the neighbor these nuts? </duck and cover ...>Sophia said:Don't like those with nuts because the nuts "disturb" me and I can't enjoy the taste of chocolate.
Yeah :-) but I was kidding in that joke.fresh_42 said:So it has been you, who gave the neighbor these nuts? </duck and cover ...>
Pretty much same as you, dark and milk. If they have hazelnut in the form of cream, better. Hazelnut in solid form I don't like. But when on cream form to make chocolate, that's the best. Needless to say nutella. I never understood why the put a bread with it in the picture. I have never eaten it like that. I just take spoon and dig in. Two very related nutella images:Sophia said:BTW what's your favourite type of chocolate? This question is for everyone.
I like milk and dark. Don't like those with nuts because the nuts "disturb" me and I can't enjoy the taste of chocolate.
Those with fruit filling and x varieties of aromas tend to be too sweet and artificial for my taste.
OK, I'm glad you confirmed my observation. I haven't bought it since then. I like another brand that resembles the original Nutella more.Borg said:Nutella in the US has been runnier over the last several years. I think that they changed their formula for the worse.
Can't think of a similar effect here. It's been pretty much the same for decades. It's viscosity is only a function of temperature. Global warming ...?Borg said:Nutella in the US has been runnier over the last several years. I think that they changed their formula for the worse.
If my observation is right, they changed a type of fat. They use some kind of liquid oil now. I don't want to describe my observation in order not to ruin the experience for others who still like it.fresh_42 said:Can't think of a similar effect here. It's been pretty much the same for decades. It's viscosity is only a function of temperature. Global warming ...?
Two things I've always to think about when it comes to Nutella:
- None of the products that came afterwards by other producers never came even near its taste.
- I can't remember a single time I managed to make a sandwich without having Nutella somewhere it wasn't supposed to end up.
With all things being equal, I would agree. I believe the oils have been changed causing it to be more viscous and separating in the product. Whenever I use it, I have to stir it first because the top third is practically liquid. I never had to do that before. And, even after it's been stirred, it still isn't that firm.fresh_42 said:It's viscosity is only a function of temperature.
Exactly.Sophia said:If my observation is right, they changed a type of fat. They use some kind of liquid oil now. I don't want to describe my observation in order not to ruin the experience for others who still like it.
I once experienced this with Heinz ketchup. I bought a hot version in Spain only to experience, that back home ours wasn't even nearly as hot.Sophia said:In my original post I said that many brands use different receptures in different countries.
You made me curious. Here's what I've found (on Wiki): (Sorry for mistakes, I used Google translate for all the adjectives I don't know.)Borg said:Exactly.
Exactly. We used to have the first type years ago when I loved it and ate it with spoon without bread. Now we have the other kind and that's why I choose the alternative brand. I miss the normal Nutella :-/fresh_42 said:You made me curious. Here's what I've found (on Wiki): (Sorry for mistakes, I used Google translate for all the adjectives I don't know.)
The recipe is not the same everywhere. In Europe Nutella is produced according to two different recipes. In Germany, a formulation is marketed which is mat glossy and spread resistant and has a slightly higher cocoa content. Nutella is more sweet and nutty in other countries (eg France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Belgium, and parts of Switzerland).
Sophia said:But I don't know why, when I ate it years ago, it was more solid, like butter, but when I bought it after a longer pause last year it was more liquid, as if melted.
Really? I don't have to do that. The one I know is very homogeneous. You don't notice any kind of oil in it. What could it be...Borg said:I believe the oils have been changed causing it to be more viscous and separating in the product. Whenever I use it, I have to stir it first because the top third is practically liquid.
Nope, I read it had to do with twitter and other social sites I don't use.zoobyshoe said:According to the news there was some sort of huge cyber attack against the internet yesterday. Personally, I didn't have any trouble accessing anything. Did anyone else among you have any internet troubles that seemed to be non-standard?
The one I use that was on the list was Amazon, but I checked and had no trouble accessing it.Evo said:Nope, I read it had to do with twitter and other social sites I don't use.
Oh, I had a message on fb to join some unknown people in their conversation. I don't know who they were but they discussed some private random topic and I was called to join them. It seemed weird but I didn't even read the whole thing and didn't think much about it and closed it. I don't know if it had to do with that hacking or not.zoobyshoe said:According to the news there was some sort of huge cyber attack against the internet yesterday. Personally, I didn't have any trouble accessing anything. Did anyone else among you have any internet troubles that seemed to be non-standard?
The hacking was supposed to have made it not possible to access certain big sites like Twitter and Amazon. Facebook wasn't listed among the affected.Sophia said:Oh, I had a message on fb to join some unknown people in their conversation. I don't know who they were but they discussed some private random topic and I was called to join them. It seemed weird but I didn't even read the whole thing and didn't think much about it and closed it. I don't know if it had to do with that hacking or not.
I see, so it probably wasn't caused by the attack.zoobyshoe said:The hacking was supposed to have made it not possible to access certain big sites like Twitter and Amazon. Facebook wasn't listed among the affected.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/...-east-coast-netflix-spotify-twitter/92507806/
It was first aimed at the east coast but the news said it later hit the west coast as well.
Specifically:[PLAIN said:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scapegoating]Scapegoating[/PLAIN] (from the verb "to scapegoat") is the practice of singling out any party for unmerited negative treatment or blame as a scapegoat.
[PLAIN said:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_guy]Fall[/PLAIN] guy is a colloquial phrase that refers to a person to whom blame is deliberately and falsely attributed in order to deflect blame from another party.
I've come to resent the psychological manipulation since hearing a TV writer in an interview say "It is your job as writer to deliver the audience to the commercial in a receptive state of mind." I guess i'd noticed they always leave you hanging but thought it was so you wouldn't switch channels during the break ...Psinter said:At my place, they are making commercials to influence people to vote.
Astronuc said:Don't do this - The video shows Eric Dossantos, of San Diego, soaring over rocky mountain slopes and outcroppings before reaching a pine forest, at which point the pilot starts to weave through gaps in the trees in a nail-biting sequence that ends with a dramatic thud.
https://gma.yahoo.com/man-wingsuit-survives-high-speed-tree-collision-daring-112903076--abc-news-topstories.html
...
...a 2012 study of BASE jumpers reported that 72 percent of jumpers “had witnessed death or serious injury of other participants in the sport, 43 percent (of) jumpers had suffered a significant BASE jump injury, and 76 percent had at least one 'near miss' incident (an incident which would most probably result in serious injury or fatality but was avoided),
I see the point that I think you mean at ~40s, but even taking that veer left then his glide path does not appear to offer sufficient altitude above ground to open his chute, not anywhere before reaching the valley floor already in view. By 25s he is already below tree top height, without a path to regain ground clearance. Thus he might have staid right intentionally to take his chances with the tree tops.Astronuc said:There is a point at which he should have veered left where the slope and trees drop below his glide plane. He kept right - and into the trees.
or Texas. - https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/e7f35523-f274-391f-b0a9-12fc3193cefd/russia-publishes-image-of.htmlstrangerep said:new Russian "Satan 2" ICBM which can (supposedly) destroy an area the size of France.
Psinter said:Scapegoating.
At my place, they are making commercials to influence people to vote. I have never had problems with adequate and educated arguments regarding that... The problem is always their illiterate approach. Besides the common every 4 year term mockery and deliberate circus show, this time they are doing something called scapegoating.:
jim hardy said:Then i started paying attention to commercials with an eye to "what is the real message?"
Usually it's "You're inadequate but our product will change your life .
strangerep said:I just read some media reports about the new Russian "Satan 2" ICBM which can (supposedly) destroy an area the size of France.
Suddenly, those 1-way Mars missions are looking far more attractive...![]()
There may or may not be something wrong with this idea, but it is actually not an example of scapegoating. There's quite a bit of difference between a "fall guy" and an "enabler." The commercials you speak of sound like they're implying the latter, not the former.Psinter said:They are saying that if you don't vote, anything bad that happens to the place in the next 4 year term, will be your fault. They are dictating that if the next leader does something bad, it will be the fault of those who didn't vote.
I think as much as 30 years ago it was common to hear people say both sides had enough bombs stockpiled to destroy the planet several times over. So, whether you destroy an area the size of France with 10 smaller bombs or 1 large bomb, it's just as destroyed and it's destroyed just as fast, and destroyed for just as long. In other words, if this new super bomb is real, it doesn't actually change anything, it just sounds worse.Sophia said:I'm 100% sure that the US has similar weapons. And it's equally scary to me as Russian ones.
Yeah, after thinking about it for a few minutes I realized it's propaganda. What would be the point of throwing that much radioactive fallout into the high altitudes over France? The jet stream(s) would carry it back to... oops.zoobyshoe said:[...] So, whether you destroy an area the size of France with 10 smaller bombs or 1 large bomb, it's just as destroyed and it's destroyed just as fast, and destroyed for just as long. In other words, if this new super bomb is real, it doesn't actually change anything, it just sounds worse.
If PF were a musical, this would be my cue to say, "Be such an ignorant thing to do, if the Russians love their children, too." :strangerep said:What would be the point of throwing that much radioactive fallout into the high altitudes over France? The jet stream(s) would carry it back to... oops.
The arguments of those commercials are a fallacy.Sophia said:Though I don't think it's scapegoating in the full sense because technically, it's true.
It is scapegoating. The definitions are clear and I'm not inventing anything (I have the source). I do not write details and point to the sources because I wrote it as a random thought and not a separate thread. Plus we were told this is not a chat and I don't want to get banned so I leave it there. You can reply to me and I will read itzoobyshoe said:There may or may not be something wrong with this idea, but it is actually not an example of scapegoating.
They may or may not be, but not all fallacious accusations are scapegoating.Psinter said:The arguments of those commercials are a fallacy.
There is a difference between saying someone is the primary cause of something and saying they are complicit, that they enabled it by doing nothing to stop it. Consider if you saw someone throw a molotov cocktail into a building and you didn't call the police or the fire department. There is a difference between someone accusing you of having thrown the firebomb, which you didn't, and someone accusing you, rightly, of having done nothing to stop the fire or the arsonist.It is scapegoating.
- Smoking is a-okay in a private home or at a business licensed for on-site consumption.
- Smoking is illegal while driving, in any public place, or anywhere where smoking tobacco is already prohibited (e.g. restaurants, bars, planes, etc).
Old pilot's saying: "Power into conifers, stall into deciduous" .Astronuc said:There is a point at which he should have veered left where the slope and trees drop below his glide plane. He kept right - and into the trees.
I don't understand the compulsion to daredevil. If i felt need of a Russian Roulette fix i'd just watch "Deer Hunter" again .mheslep said:Wingsuit flying risk seems to be akin to something like,
I don't understand your confusion. Hitler wanted a "People's Car," which was going to be called a "People's Car," which, in German, is "Volkswagen." There is no accidental play on words to speculate about.Psinter said:Volkswagen
May or may not be a play of words.
Source?zoobyshoe said:Hitler wanted a "People's Car," which was going to be called a "People's Car," which, in German, is "Volkswagen." There is no accidental play on words to speculate about.
Naturally, zooby. I have no confusion. So there's nothing to understand about confusion. When you are not certain about something you just use the word "may" like I did. Not certain does not mean confusion.zoobyshoe said:I don't understand your confusion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VolkswagenPsinter said:Source?
First definition that came up when I googled:Naturally, zooby. I have no confusion. So there's nothing to understand about confusion. When you are not certain about something you just use the word "may" like I did. Not certain does not mean confusion.
I'd "like" this three or four times but, sadly, is not possible.jim hardy said:Old pilot's saying: "Power into conifers, stall into deciduous" .
I don't understand the compulsion to daredevil. If i felt need of a Russian Roulette fix i'd just watch "Deer Hunter" again .
But then I'm over fifty. That's the age where a male starts to value his life.
old jim
mheslep said:I'd "like" this three or four times but, sadly, is not possible.
Wagen and wagon are very likely of the same origin. Same as folks and Volk I assume.Psinter said:I just noticed when my eyes by chance landed on a German writing that had the word "wagen" on it and I was like: "Wait... wagen?