What Is the Normal Force on a Person at the Top of a Ferris Wheel?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the normal force on a person at the top of a Ferris wheel with a radius of 60 meters and a speed of 25 meters/second, the mass is necessary for calculation. The centripetal acceleration is calculated to be 10.42 m/s². The relationship between centripetal force, gravitational force, and normal force is established, indicating that normal force can be expressed as a function of mass. The discussion suggests using mass as a variable and calculating the answer in terms of that variable. The user plans to report back with their findings after applying this approach.
thekeyofheart
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the normal force acting upon a person at the top of a ferris wheel that has a radius of 60 meters, and is traveling at a rate of 25 meters/second?


Homework Equations


Centripital acceleration = velocity²/radius

Centripetal Force = Gravity Force - Normal Force

Normal Force = mv²/rtmg

Gravity Force = mg


The Attempt at a Solution



The only way I know of to solve this problem is if the mass is known, but in this question the mass is not given.

Centripital acceleration = 10.42 m/s²

I tried drawing a free body force diagram


What is the next thing I should be considering?
 

Attachments

  • FerrisWheel.JPG
    FerrisWheel.JPG
    7.9 KB · Views: 3,956
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi thekeyofheart! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Well, you're certainly right … you do need to know the mass to calculate N :confused:

I think you'll have to call the mass "m", and give an answer as a multiple of m.

(unless :rolleyes: … perhaps the question is asking for the "g-force", which is really the acceleration as a multiple of g, and for which, of course, you don't need the mass)
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi thekeyofheart! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Well, you're certainly right … you do need to know the mass to calculate N :confused:

I think you'll have to call the mass "m", and give an answer as a multiple of m.

(unless :rolleyes: … perhaps the question is asking for the "g-force", which is really the acceleration as a multiple of g, and for which, of course, you don't need the mass)

Thank you for the welcome, tiny-tim! I have been a follower for a while, but I only recently made an account, and this was my first post.

I know I tend to overanalyze stuff like this, and I kept trying to figure out a way to complete the problem without knowing the mass. I am using m as a variable, and when I get the expected answer I will report back =)

Thank you for your advice!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top