What Is the Optimal Pinhole Size for Double-Slit Interference with Daylight?

Codeman
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I am trying to get a interference pattern from normal daylight and was wonder if I used a VERY FINE pinhole (micron sizes) to concentrate the light into some coherence and THEN have the double-slit plate behind the pinhole plate if this would work. How do I calculate the measurements? What is the optimal pinhole size that will give the best of both worlds between most coherence and least diffraction? If the pinhole is x then how do I calculate the slit size (length & width)? PLEASE HELP if you can...

Thank you,

Codeman
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi Codeman,

Using a very fine pinhole to concentrate the light into coherence and then using a double-slit plate behind it can indeed help in obtaining an interference pattern from normal daylight. However, the optimal diameter of the pinhole and the size of the slits will depend on several factors such as the wavelength of light, the distance between the pinhole and the double-slit plate, and the desired spacing between the interference fringes.

To calculate the optimal pinhole size, you can use the formula for diffraction-limited resolution, which is given by D = 1.22λf/D, where D is the diameter of the pinhole, λ is the wavelength of light, and f is the focal length of the lens used to project the pinhole onto the double-slit plate. This formula will give you the smallest pinhole size that will still allow enough light to pass through and create an interference pattern.

As for the size of the slits, the general rule is to make them as small as possible while still allowing enough light to pass through. The width of the slits should be smaller than the wavelength of light, and the distance between the slits should be around the same size as the width of the slits. However, the exact measurements will also depend on the factors mentioned above.

I hope this helps. Good luck with your experiment!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top