What is the Optimal Size for a Cosmological N-Body Simulation Box?

AI Thread Summary
The optimal size for a cosmological N-body simulation box can be determined by comparing the particle density in the simulation with the actual density of galaxies in the universe. One approach is to equate this density to simulate galaxy clustering accurately. Alternatively, the size can be identified by analyzing a spherical region at redshift z=0, where density fluctuations are approximately unity, typically around 8 Mpc using COBE normalization and the CDM spectrum. A referenced paper on the topic may provide further insights, although it has not been reviewed by the inquirer. Understanding these methods is crucial for effective N-body simulations in cosmology.
cosmoboy
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Could some body please explain me how to identfy the size of simulation box in cosmological n-body simulation with the physical scales in the universe. For example if I am using 128 grid points along one direction in a Particle Mesh code and total number of particles are 128*128*1228. Now there are two options, first is; we equate the density of particles in simulation box and compare it with the actual density of galaxies in the universe (for simulating galaxy clustering)
and second, we find the size of a spherical region at z=0, in which density fluctuatios are of the order of unity and identify it with
8 Mpc (Using COBE normalization, CDM spectrum).
Let me know if anyone has the answer
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I cannot answer your question, but I a short time ago I had also some questions related N-body simulations (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=43890). I did search some information about the subject and I found this paper:

Cosmological N-Body simulation: Techniques, Scope and Status
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0411043

May be it helps (although I had no time to read it till now and I do not know whether there is an answer to your question there).
 
Last edited:
dear hellfire ,
thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top