What is the optimal support angle for a steel clothing rack?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The optimal support angle for a steel clothing rack is crucial for balancing loads effectively. The discussion centers on using 7/8" or 1" stainless steel tubing with a thickness of 1/16" and a 3" lazy susan bearing capable of supporting 200 lbs. Key recommendations include positioning the support bar between 45" and 55" from the upright to minimize collapse risk, utilizing triangular gussets for load distribution, and considering the use of aircraft cable for additional support. Reinforcement of the vertical pole with a thick dowel is advised to handle bending moments effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of structural load distribution principles
  • Familiarity with welding techniques, specifically TIG welding with 316 stainless steel
  • Knowledge of beam analysis and load calculations
  • Experience with mechanical fixtures and hardware for securing tubing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "TIG welding techniques for stainless steel" to ensure strong joints
  • Study "beam deflection calculations" to analyze load impacts on the horizontal rod
  • Learn about "triangular gusset design" for effective load distribution
  • Investigate "aircraft cable support systems" for additional structural integrity
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for DIY enthusiasts, structural engineers, and anyone involved in designing or building custom clothing racks that require robust support and load management.

  • #31
JBA said:
I was able to find a paper determining the Elastic Modulus for commercial wooden dowels, which the critical material property for determining the deflection of beams; and, unfortunately, wood has a modulus that is only 10% of that for SST, which, in simple terms means that the wooden dowel insert is much to flexible to add any stiffness and support to your SST tubes. For example, replacing the SST tube on the bar with a solid 1" dowel results in a center deflection in the bar of 2.75", so if overloaded the SST tube would buckle under the load long before the wooden dowel would add any support.
Hm. I see your point. I had been assuming that the dowel would preserve the rigidity of the tube, like filling a hollow pipe with sand prior to bending it will prevent a buckle.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
DaveC426913 said:
Vertical pole is about 66" high, 1" O.D. 1/16th" gauge.
If that's not strong enough in either vertical or horizontal, I run a thick dowel up the centre of the tube.
I don't think adding wooden dowel in the centre would add a lot to the stiffness. Most stress is carried by the edge of the cylinder and the stress/strain modulus of wood is lower than steel. The wood would help resist buckling, but we hope you will be well away from that risk.
One suggestion for strengthening the round tube (other than bigger diameter and/or thicker tube) is to locally reinforce the tube at the strain peaks by sliding another tube over . I haven't done any calculations on that yet, but I've seen it used to strengthen tent ridge poles.

An alternative might be to use a square section instead of circular. My estimate of stiffness for 1"sq tube vs 1"diam cylinder is the square is about 5x as stiff, but only 30% heavier (but check that. I haven't done the full sums on square tubes yet.)

I defer to anything JBA might say, but I get a deflection of about 1.25" max on the vertical and about 0.125" on the horizontal with uniform (1.3 lb/") load and support at 42.5". (I now get that as optimum for uniform load. Though if the load is likely to be biased towards the hinge, 40" might still be better.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
13K
Replies
15
Views
28K
Replies
3
Views
2K