What is the Physical Reason for Gamma Rays Being Absorbed?

AI Thread Summary
Gamma rays are absorbed by materials due to their high energy, which interacts differently with matter compared to lower frequency electromagnetic waves. While lower frequency waves like radio waves can penetrate walls, higher frequency waves such as x-rays can pass through skin but are still absorbed by denser materials. The absorption of gamma rays is influenced by the properties of the material they encounter, rather than solely their frequency. The discussion highlights the complexity of electromagnetic wave interactions with matter, emphasizing that both the wave and the material play crucial roles. Understanding these interactions requires considering both aspects to clarify misconceptions about absorption and penetration.
jaydnul
Messages
558
Reaction score
15
But high frequency are absorbed, like gamma rays. I would think it would be the opposite. So what's the physical reason?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Why is it that lower frequency EM waves are aloud to pass through objects, but high frequency are absorbed, like gamma rays. I would think it would be the opposite. So what's the physical reason?
I believe you'll find that gamma rays have higher penetration in, say, steel, than infrared rays.
I can stop a lot of visible light with a black sheet of paper - but this has almost no effect on high energy gammas.

Where did you get this idea from?
 


This does not seem right even if one invokes the concept of plasma frequency.Metals having plasma frequency higher than frequency of light will reflect it otherwise transmit.May be you can see feynman lectures vol. 2 ,last 1/4 part for it.
 


Radio waves (low f) pass through walls that visible light doesn't. But x-rays (high f) also pass through things visible light doesn't. So frequency isn't the determining factor here perhaps?
 


lundyjb said:
But high frequency are absorbed, like gamma rays. I would think it would be the opposite. So what's the physical reason?

But x-rays, which has a higher frequency than visible light, can penetrate through your skin/body, while visible light can't!

So now we have a contradiction to your assertion, which is something that you should have brought up (I'm assuming you are well-familiar with x-rays). So now how would you proceed in your thinking? Is this whole thing really an issue with EM wave, or is this really more of a function of the material that interacts with that EM wave? Remember, there are two parties involved here - the light and the material that it is impinging upon. You seem to have dismissed the latter.

Just because the bride wears all the fancy dress and gets all the attention doesn't mean that you can ignore the groom!

Zz.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top