I What Is the Physical Significance of ##\beta_{tot}## in Molecular Polarization?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Konte
  • Start date Start date
Konte
Messages
90
Reaction score
1
Hi everybody,

The tensor of first hyperpolarizability ##\beta_{ijk}## is define as giving the second order or molecular polarization:
$$\mu_i^{(2)}=\sum_{jk} \, \beta_{ijk} E^j E^k$$

Now, I saw somewhere that an entity ##\beta_{tot}## can be define as:
$$\beta_{tot}=\left( (\beta_{xxx}+\beta_{xyy}+\beta_{xzz})^2+(\beta_{yyy}+\beta_{yzz}+\beta_{yxx})^2+(\beta_{zzz}+\beta_{zxx}+\beta_{zyy})^2\right)^{1/2}$$
What is the physical signification of this magnitude ##\beta_{tot}## ?

Thank you everybody.

Konte
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Konte said:
I saw somewhere

Where? Please give a specific reference.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top