What is the Physics of FTL-Particles and Ignorons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Evilinside
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Evilinside
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I was wondering what exactly Plancks constant describes. Do all photons have the energy h and the measure of the energy in an electromagnetic wave is just related the the frequency which photons make contact with some particle, keeping in mind that they all still have the same exact energy? Or do photons exist in a variety of energies?

I also want to ask if photons have measurable properties such as wavelength or some relative mass?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Evilinside said:
Or do photons exist in a variety of energies?

I also want to ask if photons have measurable properties such as wavelength or some relative mass?

Photons have varying energies according to the formula e=h\nu where h is Planck's constant and \nu is the frequency. Wavelength is the inverse of frequency. Higher frequency means higher energy.
 
dr_syed_ameen said:
nov.02.2005
PHOTON and PHYSICS OF FTL-PARTICLE IGNORONS
The old concept of a photon with wave-particle duality characters has been changed.Now the photon is not considered as a single particle but an entangled quantum state of two particle assembly.This is based on the reality that challenged Einstein's concept that nothing can go faster than "c".The ignorons physics brings the FTL-particles or entities,which when encounters a freed liberated charge,like an electron or proton or neutron,or positron,instantaneously unite to give birth to Electromagnetic radiation as a two body system of entangled quantum state with spin one and levitation induced masslessnes due to compatiable magnetic fields of this new quantum state.
see:

...

Dr.Syed Ameen (Ph.D.)

This material belongs strictly in Theory Development. The links are to material written by Syed, and do not represent mainstream scientific opinion. It smacks of self-promotion. Syed also has written on his theory of anti-gravity too.

It is not fair to have a legitimate thread hijacked for an individual's own agenda - i.e. pushing a "crackpot" viewpoint. The OP asked a reasonable question, and deserves a reasonable answer.

-DrC
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top