I What is the Plasmon Wave Size?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter cremor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plasmon Wave
cremor
Messages
18
Reaction score
3
Hello,

Plasmons are waves formed by electron density fluctuations on a metallic surface. Basically once excited, they can propagate freely along a suitable metallic-dielectric surface, decaying relatively quickly.

I'm interested in the y-axis component of the wave, perpendicular to the metallic surface. Electric field strenght is said to rapidly decay in this direction. Obviously so, if you compare it with other vector components associated with a propagating wave. But theoretically (I suppose no-one has tried to actually do this kind of measurement yet), just how tall would these electron waves be, if one were to measure their peak amplitude (height from surface) vs. average electron operator in a non-excited state occupying a similar metallic surface. The dielectric could be air (or vacuum) for instance. I take it that this is not just a mathematical trick and that the electron plasma oscillation does occupy actual space along the y-axis also as it propagates. What say you?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Plasmon wave seems very similar to any other transmission line wave in that the surface is subjected to local areas of raised potential. The collective charge of the free electrons in a conductor is very large indeed, so it seems to me that only the slightest movement on a sub atomic scale would be required to create the y-component of the E-field.
 
Different metals have different electron configurations. Does this mean that different metals have different forms of plasmonic oscillations? Vague question, I'm going for the Y component differences amongst different materials' plasmonic waves. Is it possible that the plasmonic excitation is considerably different in different materials of roughly indentical macroscopic topography, the frequency differences of the oscillations notwithstanding for the sake of the question? Any metamaterial studies/theories/propositions of exacerbated plasmonic magnitude of the Y-component?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top