What is the pressure acting on the air?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on understanding the pressure acting on air in a glass submerged in water. The pressure exerted by the water on the gas is defined by the equation p = p_{atm} + \Delta x \rho g, where \Delta x is the height of the air layer. Participants express confusion regarding why hydrostatic pressure is calculated using \Delta x \rho g instead of the total length of the glass L \rho g. The resolution lies in recognizing that the pressure at the interface must balance, leading to the conclusion that the relevant depth for pressure calculation is (h - \delta), not h.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrostatic pressure principles
  • Familiarity with the ideal gas law
  • Basic knowledge of fluid mechanics
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study hydrostatic pressure calculations in fluid mechanics
  • Learn about the ideal gas law and its applications
  • Explore the concept of pressure balance in fluid interfaces
  • Investigate the effects of temperature on gas pressure in closed systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and fluid dynamics who seek to deepen their understanding of pressure dynamics in submerged systems.

Lotto
Messages
253
Reaction score
16
TL;DR
If I take a glass and dip it (perpendicularly to a water surface) with its opened part into water, there should be a thin layer of compressed air. How to determine its pressure?
Let us say that the glass isn't whole under the water. If the height of the air layer under the water is ##\Delta x##, then the pressure the water acts on the gas is ##p=p_{\mathrm {atm}}+\Delta x \rho g##. But my confusion is why the "hydrostaic pressure" is ##\Delta x \rho g##, not ##L\rho g##, where ##L## is the total lenght of a dipped glass. It would be more intuitive for me. I imagine it the way that the hydrostatic pressure ##L\rho g## pushes water up into the glass. It seems strange to me that it is different.

How to explain it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lotto said:
TL;DR Summary: If I take a glass and dip it (perpendicularly to a water surface) with its opened part into water, there should be a thin layer of compressed air. How to determine its pressure?

Let us say that the glass isn't whole under the water. If the height of the air layer under the water is ##\Delta x##, then the pressure the water acts on the gas is ##p=p_{\mathrm {atm}}+\Delta x \rho g##. But my confusion is why the "hydrostaic pressure" is ##\Delta x \rho g##, not ##L\rho g##, where ##L## is the total lenght of a dipped glass. It would be more intuitive for me. I imagine it the way that the hydrostatic pressure ##L\rho g## pushes water up into the glass. It seems strange to me that it is different.

How to explain it?
1702399659850.png


Something like this?
 
erobz said:
View attachment 337132

Something like this?
Yes, exactly. My question is why the part of the total pressure is ##(h-\delta)\rho g## instead of ##h\rho g##.
 
Lotto said:
Yes, exactly. My question is why the part of the total pressure is ##(h-\delta)\rho g## instead of ##h\rho g##.
The absolute pressures of the gas above section 1-1 and the absolute hydrostatic pressure of the fluid below 1-1 must balance at their interface (if this is happening as a quasistatic equilibrium process).
 
erobz said:
The absolute pressures of the gas above section 1-1 and the absolute hydrostatic pressure of the fluid below 1-1 must balance at their interface (if this is happening as a quasistatic equilibrium process)
Yes, I know, but why is the part of the pressure ##(h-\delta)\rho g##? It is just unintuitive to me.
 
Lotto said:
Yes, I know, but why is the part of the pressure ##(h-\delta)\rho g##? It is just unintuitive to me.
I'm not getting the issue. It is that, because that is where the interface is - depth of section 1-1 relative to surface. The fluid is incompressible (virtually).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lotto
erobz said:
I'm not getting the issue. It is that, because that is where the interface is - depth of section 1-1 relative to surface. The fluid is incompressible (virtually).
Ah, OK, I can see my weird thoughts now.
 
Lotto said:
Ah, OK, I can see my weird thoughts now.
Maybe if the container of water is relatively small surrounding the cup (such that the height of water inside the container would significantly change as you dipped the cup) you can argue there is some less obvious relationship there. It still would be measured from the surface, but the surface height would have some dependency on ##\delta##.

Edit: Disregard, I got myself twisted up.
 
Last edited:
If the total pressure is ##p##, I would derive it from

##p_{atm}+h\rho g=p+\delta\rho g##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: erobz
  • #10
You don't need to mess with all that. Just use the ideal gas law assuming that the temperature is constant. If ##A## is the area of the vessel and no air escapes, the gauge pressure inside the vessel will be given by $$p_1V_1=p_2V_2\implies p_{atm}~\cancel{A}~l=p~\cancel{A}~(l-\delta)\implies p=\left(\frac{l}{l-\delta}\right)p_{atm}.$$I assume that by "total" pressure you mean absolute pressure.
 
  • #11
kuruman said:
You don't need to mess with all that. Just use the ideal gas law assuming that the temperature is constant. If ##A## is the area of the vessel and no air escapes, the gauge pressure inside the vessel will be given by $$p_1V_1=p_2V_2\implies p_{atm}~\cancel{A}~l=p~\cancel{A}~(l-\delta)\implies p=\left(\frac{l}{l-\delta}\right)p_{atm}.$$I assume that by "total" pressure you mean absolute pressure.

Lotto said:
Let us say that the glass isn't whole under the water.

In order to find ##P(h)## we need to first find ##\delta(h)##

$$ P_{atm} \cancel{A} \ell = P \cancel{A} ( \ell - \delta ) \tag{1} $$

$$ P_{atm} + \rho g h = P + \rho g \delta \tag{2} $$

##(1)## and ##(2)## combine to give ##\delta (h)##

Then sub back into ##(1)## for ##P(h)##
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K