What is the principle behind Michelson interferometer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicsissuef
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Michelson
Physicsissuef
Messages
908
Reaction score
0
Hello people!

I got big problem.

l=\frac{ct_n}{2} - the light in one way.

Here are the pictures, I think you'll see what I am talking about.

http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture001id5.jpg

http://img135.imageshack.us/my.php?image=picture002tx5.jpg

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e7/Interferometer.svg

Please help!

Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Physicsissuef said:
l=\frac{ct_n}{2} - the light in one way.

This equations says (apparently) that light travels a distance 2l. A-to-M2, and M2-to-A1, are each a distance l.
Perhaps they are assuming very small angles, so that M2-to-B is approximately l also. You're right, they can't all be exactly equal to l.
 
Why they aren't using Pitagorean theorem? If they use Pitagorean theorem, "x" or "l" (as they say) would be \frac{t_nc\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}{2}, right?
 
Physicsissuef said:
Why they aren't using Pitagorean theorem? If they use Pitagorean theorem, "x" or "l" (as they say) would be \frac{t_nc\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}{2}, right?

Rearrange your expression

l = \frac{t_nc\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}{2} \quad _{(1)}

to get

t_n = \frac{2l}{c}\left(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2} \right)^{-1/2} \quad _{(2)}

then that is exactly what I see in the photographed text at the bottom of the your first image.
 
Last edited:
Also: the red "l"s in the first image are incorrect. Those distances are greater than l.

edit:
This contradicts my earlier post. I've since realized that the figure is in the reference frame of the "ether", in which those distances (A-to-M1) are greater than l. They are equal to l in the lab reference frame only.
 
Last edited:
I think the second picture is where the Michelson interferometer is in the ether. So the real distances are "l", but when the Michelson interferometer is on the earth, also there is effect from the ground, and the light "turns" by some angle, so those "l"-s on the first pictures are actually greater then "l", and the normal distance is "l".
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top