Biology What Is the Probability Dolor and Largo Are Both Carriers of Herrera Syndrome?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Genetics population
AI Thread Summary
Dolor and Largo are concerned about the genetic risks for their child due to their close relation and the family history of Herrera syndrome. They are trying to determine the probability that both are carriers of the syndrome, with calculations suggesting a 1 in 16 chance based on their grandmother's carrier status. Additionally, they are exploring the likelihood of having a child with Herrera syndrome, estimating a 1 in 64 probability for this outcome. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding genetic inheritance patterns in close relatives. Accurate calculations are crucial for assessing the risks associated with inherited disorders.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Dolor and her cousin Largo have conceived a child. They are very concerned about the baby, because they have heard that children of close relatives have a higher incidence of birth defects and/or inherited recessive disorders. They know that their maternal grandmother was a carrier of the Herrera syndrome allele. Assuming that this is the only source of genetic problems for Dolor and Largo, what is the chance that they are both carriers ?
a. 1 in 16

b. 1 in 4

c. 1 in 8

d. 1 in 106

e. 1 in 2



Homework Equations


See below.


The Attempt at a Solution



Each grandchild has ¼ probability of carrying one of four original alleles from grandparents, so the probability of both being carriers is (¼)* (1/4) = 1/16?




Homework Statement


The chance that Dolor and Largo will have a child with Herrera’s
syndrome is
a. 1 in 4

b. 1 in 64

c. 1 in 32

d. 1 in 16

e. 1 in 12




Homework Equations


See below.


The Attempt at a Solution


For the great-grandchild there is a 1/8 probability (of gametes) for getting a recessive allele, so

(1/8) * (1/8) = 1/64?


Thank you for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything sounds right.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top