What is the Probability of Different Poker Hands?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gimpy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Brain hand
gimpy
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I think my brain is freezing. I can't see how to get the answers to these questions.

A poker hand is defined as drawing 5 cards at random without replacement from a deck of 52 playing cards. Find the probability of each of the following poker hands.

(a) Full House (one pair and one triple of cards with the same face value).

(b) Three of a kind (three equal face values plus two cards of different values).

(c) One pair (one pair of equal face value plus three cards of a different kind).

So for (a) i got \frac{C(26,2)C(11,1)}{C(52,2)}. But I am so lost. To much studying this week :S.

The answers in the back f the book are
(a) 0.00144
(b) 0.02113
(c) 0.42257

Can anyone help me out?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is a full house also a three of a kind? Is a full house also a pair?

Consider that there are \binom{52}{5} possible different poker hands, all of which are equaly likely. So if you can figure out the number of different hands that are , for example a four of a kind, then you're home free.

So, let's look at the possibilities for a four of a kind:
There are 13 different card values that the four of a kind can have, and there are 48 other cards that can be in the four of a kind, so the odds of getting a four of a kind are:
\frac{13*48}{\binom{52}{5}}
 
Thanks for your reply,

Well i understand that. That was actually one of the questions which i got. Say for:
(a) Full House (one pair and one triple of cards with the same face value).

there are 13 different three of a kind that you can get just like 4 of a kind. Then you are left with 49 cards which equals 24 pairs which one left over and only 12 distinct pairs. So does this mean:
\frac{13*24}{\binom{52}{5}}
or take the pair first, therefore 26 pairs and then 12 ways of selecting 3 of a kind.
\frac{26*12}{\binom{52}{5}}

Both of those answers doesn't correspond to the answer 0.00144 in the book.

Im so confused
 
Well, there's a little bit more to it:

There are 13*\binom{4}{3} three of a kinds, and 12*\binom{4}{2} remaining pairs. So for a full house it's:
\frac{13\binom{4}{3}*12\binom{4}{2}}{\binom{52}{5}}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top