What is the Purpose of Green's Function?

Messages
19,773
Reaction score
10,728
Definition/Summary

Green's function G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) can be defined thus

\mathcal{L}G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) + \delta\left(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\xi}\right) = 0\;\;\; \mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi} \in \mathbb{R}^n

Where \mathcal{L} is a linear differential operator, \mathbf{\xi} is an arbitrary point in \mathbb{R}^n and \delta is the Dirac Delta function.

Equations



Extended explanation

The Green's function for a particular linear differential operator \mathcal{L}, is an integral kernel that can be used to solve differential equations with appropriate boundary conditions. Given a linear differential equation

\mathcal{L}u\left(\mathbf{x}\right) = \psi\left(\mathbf{x}\right)\ \ \ \ \ \ \left(*\right)

and the Green's function for the linear differential operator \mathcal{L}, one can derive an integral representation for the solution u\left(\mathbf{x}\right) as follows:

Consider the definition of Green's function above

\mathcal{L}G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) + \delta\left(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\xi}\right) = 0 \Leftrightarrow \mathcal{L}G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) = -\delta\left(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\xi}\right)

Now multiplying through by \psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) and integrating over some bounded measure space \Omega with respect to \mathbf{\xi}

-\int_\Omega \delta\left(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\xi}\right)\psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) d\mathbf{\xi} = \int_\Omega \mathcal{L}G \left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) \psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) d\mathbf{\xi}\hspace{2cm}\left(**\right)

Noting that by the properties of the Dirac Delta function

\int_\Omega \delta\left(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\xi}\right)\psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) d\mathbf{\xi} = \psi\left(\mathbf{x}\right)

And from (*)

\int_\Omega \delta\left(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{\xi}\right)\psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) d\mathbf{\xi} = \mathcal{L}u\left(\mathbf{x}\right)

Hence (**) may be rewritten thus

\mathcal{L}u\left(\mathbf{x}\right) = - \int_\Omega \mathcal{L}G \left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) \psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) d\mathbf{\xi}

Since \mathcal{L} is a linear differential operator, which does not act on the variable of integration we may write:

u\left(\mathbf{x}\right) = - \int_\Omega G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) \psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) d\mathbf{\xi}

Hence we have obtained an integral representation for u\left(x\right). However, to evaluate this integral knowlagde of the explicit form of both G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) and \psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) are required. Furthermore, even if both G\left(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{\xi}\right) and \psi\left(\mathbf{\xi}\right) are known, the associated integral may not be a trivial exercise. In addition, every linear differential operator does not admit a Green's Function.

It would also be prudent to point out at this point that in general, Green's functions are distributions rather than classical functions.

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For short, a Green's function ##G## can be used to determine a given function ##f##:

Loosely speaking, if such a function ##G## can be found for the operator ##L##, then, if we multiply the equation
$$
LG(x,\xi) = \delta(\xi -x)
$$
for the Green's function by ##f(\xi)##, and then integrate with respect to ##\xi##, we obtain,
$$
\int LG(x,\xi)f(\xi)\,d\xi=\int \delta (x-\xi)f(\xi)\,ds=f(x)
$$
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top