What is the purpose of this NPR feature?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The NPR feature raises questions about the purpose of unconventional math problems in job interviews, suggesting they assess problem-solving skills and exposure to mathematical concepts rather than pure mathematical ability. Such questions often reveal a candidate's interest in the subject beyond basic requirements, as seen in examples like counting methods. The discussion critiques the effectiveness of these odd questions, noting that they can lead to mismatches in job roles, particularly for engineers who may end up in less technical positions. Additionally, there is frustration expressed over marketing strategies that prioritize curiosity over clarity, comparing them to ineffective advertising campaigns. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of evaluating skills and interests through unconventional interview techniques.
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That seems most bizarre (it's not april 1st is it) since knowing the answer to that is not a sign of mathematical skill in the slightest.
 
It may not be a sign of mathematical skill, but it is a sign of the subjects a person has been exposed to. Understanding what the sign is asking for weeds out an awful lot of people. It also measures a few other non-mathematical traits - the few that will successfully log on to the site not only know what a prime number is and what 'e' is, they are problem solvers because they enjoy it, not because they have to be.

I've seen a few other odd 'math' equations for job interviews - "How high can you count on your fingers?" probably being the oddest. 99 would be a very good answer (Chisenbop method), 1023 even better (binary) - 1,048,755 would probably guarantee a person of beating out all the competition on at least this question (a hexadecimal modification of an ancient Chinese finger counting method).

The odd questions are usually not too technical, but require an interest that goes beyond just meeting the normal minimum requirements to complete a course. Microsoft used to be notorious for the 'odd' questions and many of their old job interview questions now circulate around as popular brain teasers.

The reason is because quite a few can 'survive' tough math courses hoping for a good paying job in which maybe they escape having to actually do anything with the math or science they 'survived'. In fact, a few engineers find a job that a data entry technician could do and hang onto that job as long as possible, never even dreaming of advancing to a responsible job. Of course, eventually, management realizes they could find someone much cheaper than an engineer to do the job and transfers the person to more appropriate tasks for an engineer. The person almost always becomes depressed in his new job, starts sending out resumes, and quickly moves on in search of a less technical engineering job.
 
But the bill-board gives no indication of what one might find if one were to "solve" this puzzle (the article actually states this to be a problem to 'solve'). Given the bloody annoying advertising campaigns of, say, More Than (no idea if that company exists outside the Uk/EU, dobut it), whereby the marketing is done without reference to the product in an attempt to build up curiosity, I'm more than likely to think that the people who dreamt up that campaign are annoying morons.

If there were a heading such as 'looking for a more exciting challenge?' then I could understand it. Note this is a comment about the PR people. The armed forces have such campaigns on UK tv.

More Than, for those who haven't seen the damn thing, used to post fake flyers and adverts about a lost dog, called Lucky. They did lots of variations in an attempt to get their name known before they'd even launched any products. I'm with Bill Hicks on this one: if you're in advertising, kill yourself.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top