What is the purpose of using a potential well to model a particle's confinement?

Jacky
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What does a particle in a potential well means?
What is the physical interpretation of it?
Could anyone anser this topic
 
Physics news on Phys.org
particle in potential well is like an electron in electric field of proton in hydrogen atom . in hydrogen the well is sphrical
 
In very general terms, you use the potential well to model a situation under which the particle is forbidden to leave a certain region of space, for whatever reason.

For example, for the electron of a hydrogen atom the model is quite good, because the energy required to strip the electron away is high. The model sets the potential energy barrier to infinite as if you were assuming that the energy required is so high that in your case you can be pretty sure it will never be reached.

A similar situation could be a conduction electron in a block of metal, and the box is the entire block. If for your purposes you can assume that nothing will give it the opportunity to leave the block, then you can use the potential well as a model. Of course, it's a very rough model, it doesn't mean it will be precise enough for all purposes... in fact in the metal case it might give you too much an approximated wavefunction, and you may want to instead include the effect of all the lattice to get a wavefunction and therefore a probability density more representative of the real thing.

But it's an important model nonetheless because the rough result (the shapes of the eigenfunctions) is still "visible" in more precise models.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
489
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top